On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:50, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 25 mars 2011 à 10:39, Vincent Massol a écrit : >>> Honestly, I have a hard time to keep up with the maven versions... >>> I was somewhat more active at maven 1 and now maven 3 would be imposed me... >> >> Well this is only if you need to build xwiki from sources and honestly >> installing maven is so easy (takes exactly 1 minute last time I timed it!) >> that I can't see this as a real blocker :) > > Hence the +0. > Was it Curriki, I had bragged. > >> Note that maven3 is much better than the 2 and a lot faster so you'll >> benefit ;) >> Thanks for your feedback though. > > I feel there's a use in staying at classics such as older maven or older ant. > Everyone knows them and you don't have to relearn. > > But I am sure Thomas had arguments in favor of Maven3... he did not mention > them.
As i said there is first: "Plus I prefer having a build certified working on 3.0 than 2.2 and I don't want to build everything twice with both maven versions on our ci build just for that." (with some corrections ;)) Also same argument as Vincent: maven 3 has better performance and is the last one and i don't see why we would use an older one > > paul > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
