On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
> And who wants to be the release manager? Any volunteers?

I volunteer


Jerome

>
> Note that this will be an experimental release, since it will be the
> first one done on Git instead of SVN. If nobody's brave enough, I can
> try it.
>
> On 03/25/2011 12:27 AM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 03/23/2011 03:23 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> It's time for the roadmap planning again. After a first round of offline 
>>> discussions with several committers here's a proposal for XE 3.1.
>>> Please correct or add other things if I've missed anything.
>>>
>>> Must have
>>> ========
>>>
>>> - Extension Manager: Thomas and UI person (Jerome) (Cati needed for 
>>> additional mockups). Thomas to define more precisely the list of features 
>>> he'd like to implement for XE 3.1
>>> - Performance Improvements: Marius, maybe Caleb if available. Marius needs 
>>> to prepare an action plan ASAP since "perf improvements" in general is too 
>>> vague. Caleb, you mentioned you'd be ok to implement support for marge 
>>> number of XObjects if you have the time, right?
>>
>> That is the plan.
>> Also the cache store can be performance tuned a little bit and since there 
>> seem to be some coherency
>> issues, that is at the top of my list.
>>
>>> - New backend implementation of Rights: Sergiu. Requires 
>>> proposals/discussions since it's large and complex beast.
>>> - "Application Within Minutes": continue investigation (Ludovic), 
>>> committers to review the Design page and since it's a large feature we need 
>>> to break it down into individual tasks and start implementing some of them 
>>> in 3.1. Sergiu volunteered for implementing some of them. Ludovic 
>>> volunteered to do the breakdown.
>>> - Search improvements and especially scoring, French support and wildcard 
>>> issues: Sergiu
>>> - Friends and Status polishing: Sergiu, but not clear what needs to be done 
>>> except "Privacy" which is needed
>>> - Dashboard/Gadgets polishing: Anca (Anca could you detail what you'd like 
>>> to implement?)
>>> - Stabilization of the new Filesystem storage implementation for 
>>> attachments (bugfixing, performance, etc): Caleb
>>
>> Sure thing.
>> It looks good to go but, as always; safety first.
>>
>>>
>>> Nice to have
>>> ==========
>>>
>>> - Statistics polishing: ?
>>> - XE/XEM Home Page investigation and mockups: Ludovic&  Caty
>>> - XEM Workspaces investigation/review: ?
>>> - More modules moved out of xwiki-core. Candidates: xwiki-url, 
>>> xwiki-action, xwiki-localization, new xwiki-resources: Vincent to work on 
>>> this
>>>
>>> Proposed Dates
>>> =============
>>>
>>> - XE 3.1M1: 25 april
>>> - XE 3.1M2: 16 May
>>> - XE 3.1RC1: 30 May
>>> - XE 3.1 final: 13 June
>>>
>>> That's about 2.5 months. Note that at this rate we won't have time to reach 
>>> XE 3.7 by the end of the year (end of the cycle). So we'll need to decide 
>>> at some point if:
>>> a) we consider that a cycle is less major releases (say 5 only if we keep 
>>> 2.5 months/release)
>>> b) we consider that a cycle spans a year (time-based) and it doesn't matter 
>>> if we're at 3.5 or 3.11 at the end of the year, we consider the last 
>>> release of the year to be the end of the cycle
>>> c) we consider that 2.5 months is too long for release cycles and we reduce 
>>> it. To have 7 releases we need to reduce to 1.5 months per release roughly 
>>> (that could be 2 weeks for M1, 2 weeks for M2, 1 week for RC1, 1 week for 
>>> final).
>>>
>>> My preference goes to b) right now and when we'll have moved more stuff out 
>>> of the old xwiki-core into new modules, it'll be easier to have tests 
>>> committed when code is committed and thus we'll be able to move to c) IMO.
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>
>
> --
> Sergiu Dumitriu
> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to