Same as Sergiu, I prefer shorter names but artifactId is not that bad. So 0.
Thanks, Marius On 04/05/2011 02:19 PM, Jerome Velociter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu<[email protected]> wrote: >> On 04/05/2011 11:03 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>> Hi devs, >>> >>> The proposal is to use artifactid as directory names. >>> >>> Note that this is what I did for commons and rendering when I did the move >>> to top level project. You can check how it looks like here: >>> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/commons/ >>> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/rendering/ >>> >>> I suggest we keep one strategy only for consistency. >>> >>> Some discussion here too: >>> http://www.sonatype.com/people/2011/01/maven-tip-project-directories-and-artifact-ids/ >>> >>> I know there are some cons (see my comment in the link above) but overall I >>> find it simple to implement and with autocompletion not such a big issue. >>> >>> WDYT? >> >> 0. I'd prefer shorter names, but I don't have a strong preference for >> it. Either way works. > > Same as Sergiu, I would prefer shorter names ; but no strong feelings either. > 0 > > Jerome > >> >>> If you don't like this then please propose an alternative solution and >>> remember that we'll need to refactor commons and rendering in this case too. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >> >> >> -- >> Sergiu Dumitriu >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
