On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 15:44, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/08/2011 03:15 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: >> For simplicity I suggest we keep working on svn for the 3.0 branch. >> The project organization is very different between 3.1 and 3.0 and I >> don't see us doing the same refactoring on 3.0 branch. >> >> It means merging stuff by hand but it's not very hard. > > +1. An alternative would be to not have a 3.0.1 at all.
Yes I tough about that but lets say the branch is here and if there is something really blocker we have this solution for 3.0. > > This strategy should be applied for the 2.7 branch. +1 anyway we are supposed to since we already have a stable branch > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
