+100
If you have any trouble just ask, you can detect the name calling class by
extending SecurityManager.
Caleb
On 05/10/2011 11:42 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 05:03 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to commit @Inject injection of Loggers at the same time as I do the
>> switch to SLF4J/Logback (I have it mostly done on my machine).
>>
>> The idea is to move from:
>>
>> public MyComponent implements LogEnabled, MyComponentRole
>> {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> to:
>>
>> public MyComponent implements MyComponentRole
>> {
>> @Inject
>> private Logger logger;
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> Rationale:
>> * More consistent with how we inject dependencies
>> * Makes it easier to move to another DI framework later on (CDI, Guice, etc)
>> since the way to implement this with them is to use the JSR299 @Producer
>> annotation on a class that produces Loggers.
>> * Allows to keep the current logging behavior unchanged for backward
>> compatibility (we juste deprecate it).
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> +1 if it works. I didn't like LogEnabled from the start.
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
