On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 19:40, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi committers,
>
> We're having a hard time stabilizing our build (especially the functional 
> test part, see my previous mail entitled "[VOTE] Important: Strategy to fix 
> failing tests and stability"). Now I believe that it's going to be hard to 
> enforce it and thus I'd like to propose a variation:
>
> * The Build Manager has the *responsibility* to get the build fixed ASAP 
> whenever it's failing. His priority #1 during the week becomes monitoring the 
> Build
> * By "Build" we mean the CI Build on ci.xwiki.org and by "failing" we mean 
> anything that makes the build fail: tests, compilation, clirr, etc.
> * Every week we have a different Build Manager chosen amongst the Committers

A week seems a bit short but in the other hand it will seems pretty
long for the Build Manager itself I'm sure ;)

> * In order to fix build issues the Build Manager has several possibilities:
> - find out who caused the build to break and ask that person to fix it. That 
> person cannot refuse that and must consider it his/her priority to fix it (or 
> rollback the change that caused the build to fail)
> - rollback the issue that caused the build to fail
> - fix it himself/herself
> - find someone knowledgable in the failing domain and get him/her to fix the 
> build.
> * At the end of the Week the Build Manager hands over his duty to the next 
> Build Manager by contacting him/her.
> * We create a Build Manager Roster page on dev.xwiki.org to log past Build 
> Managers (and possibly future ones if some have expressed the wish to be the 
> Build Manager for a specific week).
> * All committers must perform this duty and take turns
>
> Since I've started doing this this week, I propose to take this role for the 
> current week. I'm also proposing to log Caleb has having been the Build 
> Manager for the past week since he's done a lot to stabilize the build.
>
> If the vote is passed I'll log this on the Committership page as a Committer 
> duty (I'll also cross reference it from the Build page).
>
> Here's my +1

+1

What don't you think about designed people who broke the build the
most for the following week ?

>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to