On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Result: 5 +1, 1 +0 and no -1 >>> >>> The vote is passed. I'll try to move them today to >>> https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/sandbox (note that the calendar plugin >>> will be renamed since there's already a xwiki-calendar module in there - >>> not sure what it is, probably a GSOC one). >> >> Why in sandbox ? I would say either in their own repository or in retired. > > Because: > 1) own repo means that the project is active and someone is an owner of it. > We don't have any owner for these projects ATM. They can be graduated from > sandbox when someone takes the ownership and release a new version of them. > 2) retired mean that these projects are not useful any more and have been > replaced by better stuff. I think they're still useful for most of them, at > least for: photo album, calendar, exo, alexa, adwords and s5. For workstream > it's possible it's not useful anymore with our new message stream. > > Said differently retired projects means to people: don't even bother about > those, they're dead and not useful any more. While sandbox means: these > projects are in uncertain states but can still be useful if someone brings a > little love to them. > > At least that's how I view the difference. > > Of course, these projets use the old plugin technology so we could decide > that anything that uses the old plugin tech should be retired. But if we do > this we need to decide this for all other projects using plugin tech too, not > just these ones and there are lots of plugin projects in their own repos and > in sandbox (not mentioning the several plugins that even in platform and that > are not retired). We should also consider that some people may be using the > photo album or calendar plugins so moving them to retired isn't a good idea > IMO. > > WDYT?
Problem whit moving theses project to sandbox is that sandbox does not fits very well project which already have tags and branches and several versions already. If a project was graduate from sandbox to own repository and because not very active anymore I doubt we would put it back in sandbox. > > Thanks > -Vincent > >> >>> >>> Thanks >>> -Vincent >>> >>> On Apr 5, 2011, at 6:55 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm proposing to move the following modules from xwiki-platform-core to >>>> separate git repos in a xwiki-contrib organization on GitHub: >>>> >>>> xwiki-platform-calendar >>>> xwiki-platform-exo >>>> xwiki-platform-adwords >>>> xwiki-platform-alexa >>>> xwiki-platform-photoalbum >>>> xwiki-platform-s5 >>>> xwiki-platform-workstream >>>> >>>> Rationale: >>>> * They're no longer working or supported >>>> * We can move them back if the xwiki dev team wants to support them again >>>> in the future >>>> * It's cleaner than having a retired module in the xwiki organization >>>> since a) it's not "polluting" the list of repos supported by the xwiki dev >>>> team and b) it allows them to be separated in repos >>>> >>>> Future: >>>> * Also move modules currently in svn contrib to xwiki-contrib org. Note >>>> that we need to verify if the svn app works with the GitHub svn >>>> integration too since several users of svn contrib are using it. >>>> >>>> Here's my +1 >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
