+1

Thanks,
Marius

On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I see that in ApplicationResources.properties we now have some wrongly named 
> properties.
> For example for the scheduler I find properties of the type xe.scheduler.* 
> but the scheduler is now in the platform.
>
> There are also resources named core.*
>
> Thus I'd like to propose a simple rule:
>
> <short top level projet name>.<short module name>.<propertyName>
>
> where:
> <short top level projet name> = top level projet name without the "xwiki-" 
> prefix, for example: commons, rendering, platform, enterprise, manager, etc
> <short module name> = the name of the maven module without the <short top 
> level project name> prefix, for example: oldcore, scheduler, activitystream, 
> etc
> <propertyName> = the name of the property using camel case, ex: 
> updateJobClassCommitComment
>
> For example the property core.importer.package.version would be renamed in 
> platform.web.packageVersion
>
> The only issue is when we rename modules we need to rename the properties for 
> that module but I don't see any way out of this if we want to have expressive 
> property names. But at least it's an easy and mechanic change
>
> I also propose to introduce a different resource property file that will hold 
> deprecated properties and that we can put in the xwiki-platform-legacy 
> module. We could call it DeprecatedApplicationResources*.properties
>
> Of course in the future each module should be able to contribute both 
> resource properties (but they would use the same naming scheme!).
>
> Even though this is not the topic of this mail this is how I'd implement this 
> in the future:
> * Implement a TranslationPropertiesConfigurationSource that is initialized by 
> reading all property files found in the classloader under 
> META-INF/translations.properties and 
> META-INF/translations-deprecated.properties. This component would listen to 
> observation events so that when a new jar is installed by the extension 
> manager it can check if it provides some translations and add them.
> * Have a Translation Manager component which is the main API to be used by 
> other modules wishing to get translations. This manager would use the 
> TranslationPropertiesConfigurationSource component.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to