of course +1 for VarA :-)

2011/12/20 Raluca Stavro <[email protected]>

> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ludovic suggested we should refresh the Default Color Theme for XE 3.4
> with
> > something new. Since (and long before) we dropped support for IE6 and IE7
> > (XE 3.2) I wanted to add some CSS3 enhancement to our default skin:
> > shadows, gradients, round corners, etc. So this is a good time to make a
> > proposal that integrates some CSS3 (gradients on menus, panels, tabs,
> > buttons, forms; text-shadows; box-shadows; border-radius;) and a new
> > ColorTheme into Colibri skin:
> > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/34Proposal
> >
> > There are 3 directions that can be voted for this proposal:
> >
> > *Var A:* Integrate the proposed Skin improvements and the new ColorTheme
> > into platform
> > Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/WebHome
> >
> > *Var B: *Don't integrate anything in the 3.4 timeframe and wait for a new
> > complete skin in 4.x = Current skin + default ColorTheme (no changes)
> > Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/WebHome
> >
> > *Var C:* Integrate just the new proposed ColorTheme that will replace the
> > current DefaultColorTheme
> > Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Standards/WebHome
> >
> >
> >
> > *Important remarks when making a decision:*
> >
> > *Var B* and *Var C *does not involve any changes, problems or advantages
> > from the current Colibri skin.
> >
> > Advantages for *Var A*:
> > - Tested on IE7, IE8, IE9, Opera 11, Chrome 16, Firefox 8, Safari 5 and
> > works beautifully.
> > - Uses CSS3 declarations that makes the skin more nice (gradients, round
> > corners, shades, etc.)
> >
> > Problems for *Var A*:
> > - The existing ColorThemes (from the ColorThemes space and
> > extensions.xwiki.org) will become deprecated for XE 3.4 since the new
> skin
> > needs shades for the gradients (this means the existing ColorThemes
> > variables will be either used in ways they were not intended or they will
> > not have all the variables declared). See my previous mail about
> > "[Discussion]
> > Problematic ColorTheme
> > extensibility"<http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ex6fgou6fl6vjwfr>
> > - The CSS will become even more invalid (right now we have a
> > -moz-border-radius and a word-wrap non valid declarations), but the new
> > code contains 154 declarations for the gradients (covering
> > -moz-linear-gradient, -webkit-gradient, -webkit-linear-gradient,
> > -o-linear-gradient, -ms-linear-gradient, linear-gradient and filter:
> > progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient proprietary declarations). The
> > invalidity comes because the proprietary declarations are not yet W3C
> > standard (and will not ever be a standard). The proposed standard W3C
> > declaration (linear-gradient) is not yet supported consistently and
> > correctly by browsers, but when it will become standard we can remove all
> > the other proprietary declarations.
> >
> >
> +1 for Var A.
> It looks way better than what we have right now and given the fact that we
> will be able to update the CSS once linear-gradient will consistently be
> supported by browsers, I think that we should do this step and provide a
> brighter UI.
>
> Raluca.
>
>
> > Please cast your vote.
> > Thanks,
> > Caty
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Guillaume Fenollar
XWiki SysAdmin
Tel : +33 (0)1.83.62.65.97
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to