2012/1/7 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > On 01/07/2012 06:15 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As there are now more projects using the Curriki Distribution, in the >> Curriki mailing list we have voted for the following changes for the >> Curriki Project: >> >> * Rename the main project xwiki-learning-cms >> * Call the core: xwiki-learning-cms-core: >> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/**xwiki/xwiki-learning-cms/** >> xwiki-learning-cms-core<http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/xwiki-learning-cms/xwiki-learning-cms-core> >> * Call the curriki specific code : curriki: >> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/**xwiki/xwiki-learning-cms/**curriki<http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/xwiki-learning-cms/curriki> >> * Call the planete sankoré specific code : sankore: >> http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/**xwiki/xwiki-learning-cms/**sankore<http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/xwiki-learning-cms/sankore> >> >> The curriki 1.8 branches would go into the curriki area, except for the >> latest branch which would be duplicated in xwiki-kearning-cms-core as the >> 1.0 branch >> The 2.x branches would go into xwiki-learning-cms-core >> >> We would then publish the sankore core to the repository. >> As you can see these plans are based on SVN. A separate discussion is >> undergoing to see if we can easily move to GitHub. >> >> In this case we would ask for one or more repositories in the >> xwiki-contrib >> area. It's not clear to me in this case if we should use only one or 3 >> different repositories. I tend to think it should be 3. >> >> Finally we would rename curriki.xwiki.org into lcms.xwiki.org. >> >> We're asking the goahead from the XWiki commiters to make these changes. >> >> Here's my +1 >> > > Here's my not so relevant +1, I didn't interact much with this area of > XWiki, but I welcome the extraction of a more generic core on which > projects like Curriki and Sankore are built. > > For the GitHub discussion, I agree that three repositories would be > better, but I'm not sure xwiki-contrib is the best home. On SVN it was a > top level directory, not one inside contrib, so we could make it part of > the xwiki organization. Plus, these projects are big enough not to be > considered mere contributions. On the other hand, it is not something > maintained by the XWiki committers, so we might not want to send the wrong > message: "it's a project maintained by the XWiki organization". So a third > option would be to create a new organization for it, since it's free. I'm > no voting on this point, since I don't have a strong preference, I'll let > others decide.
As Vincent pointed out, xwiki-contrib does not require that the project is maintained by XWiki commiters. Also the whole point of the change is to keep it close to the XWiki organization and to avoid the confusion between the core code and the curriki.org web site. Now I think it's good to keep xwiki-lcms in the XWiki Organization umbrella. Creating an independent zone might make it more clear what exists in the LCMS (which stands for Learning CMS if you did not guess), and show it's more mature. I'll respond to Vincent's mail which goes more in the details Ludovic -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > ______________________________**_________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs<http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > -- Ludovic Dubost Founder and CEO Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/ XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
