Hi Benjamin, On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Benjamin Lanciaux < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Thanks for your feedback. > [..] > About the reported bugs, they are all fixed (language, scroll bars etc.). > That was due to a bad html import in xwiki.org whereas it worked well > everywhere else. > [..] > > You can check the survey by clicking on the following link : > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012 Indeed, it looks a lot better now. I'd suggest two small tweaks: - potentially highlight a bit the listed sections/themes - if possible, push the bold recommendations text below the XWiki icon Regards, Florin > > > Thanks for helping > > Benjamin > > 2012/1/24 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> > > > On 01/24/2012 02:53 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On 01/23/2012 12:19 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi devs, > >>>> > >>>> In 2009 we launched a survey on xwiki.org: > >>>> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/**bin/view/Main/**SurveyXWikiFeatures2009< > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2009> > >>>> > >>>> The results were published here: > >>>> - > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/**bin/view/Blog/Features+Survey+**Results< > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Features+Survey+Results> > >>>> - http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/**bin/view/Blog/**FeatureStatus20120119< > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/FeatureStatus20120119> > >>>> > >>>> The idea is to do that same with a new survey. Benjamin Lanciaux (from > >>>> XWiki SAS) has prepared one here: > >>>> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/**bin/view/Main/**SurveyXWikiFeatures2012< > http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/SurveyXWikiFeatures2012> > >>>> > >>>> Please let me know if you're ok and I'll send the survey on the user > >>>> list. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On top of Florin's remarks, I'd like to add that, in my opinion, the > >>> themes > >>> are not that well composed. > >>> > >>> Applications and App Store mixes several different things. On one hand > it > >>> includes something as generic as "More apps bundled", then it goes to > >>> something as specific as "Glossary". Plus, it includes the "XWiki > >>> Network" > >>> which isn't something that the open source community handles. Why are > >>> there > >>> only two specific apps mentioned? Was it somehow determined that these > >>> are > >>> the most important apps requested by the community? > >>> > >>> Dev Tools: I'm not sure we should have this section at all. What is the > >>> target of this survey? People that can understand and have an opinion > on > >>> this section aren't casual users. We're mixing user-facing features and > >>> platform internals. Most of the items proposed here, like the new data > >>> model > >>> or interface extensions, can only be evaluated by experienced > committers. > >>> Others, such as "Syntax coloring" and "Livetable improvements", might > fit > >>> better in the "User dev tools" section. There is a risk that these very > >>> technical items be considered important only by a handful of > committers, > >>> thus getting a very low score, although they are a precondition for > >>> implementing other features proposed in the survey. Typo: > >>> "Translate->Translatable document objects". > >>> > >>> Quality: This is another section that seems to mix a broad range of > >>> topics, > >>> from UI/UX improvements to internal aspects like LDAP, and build stuff > >>> like > >>> automated integration tests. Maybe instead of "Run Automated UI > >>> Tests..." we > >>> should say something that most users can relate to, such as "Better > >>> quality > >>> assurance for the supported browsers and databases". Why is multipage > >>> export > >>> related to quality? And will users understand the difference between > this > >>> multipage export and the one in the "Wiki Management" section? Typo: > >>> "Sync > >>> big (more then->than 2000 users) LDAP/AD groups". > >>> > >>> Ease of Use: I don't see the difference between some of the items here > >>> and > >>> items from the previous category. > >>> > >>> Help: I'd rename this section "Documentation". For "Shortcut help" I'd > >>> link > >>> to the design page where it's pretty neatly detailed. > >>> > >>> > >> Universal Access: This should be renamed to Mobile Access, since it > only > >>> lists mobile-related items. "Universal" access implies more than a > phone, > >>> and should include stuff like better support for R2L languages, better > >>> support for screen readers, a voice stylesheet, better stylesheet for > >>> print, > >>> stylesheets for small screens and for TVs. If you want to keep the > >>> "Universal Access" title, then some of the items I mentioned should be > >>> included in the survey as well. > >>> > >> > >> I don't think it's bad to have a generic category name as "Universal > >> access" even if we list only mobile related items. For me this is an > >> open door for users to suggest features in that domain. Listing other > >> items is not bad either but may send the wrong message that there is > >> already someone (e.g. XWiki SAS) interested in implementing that > >> feature, which might not be true. > >> > > > > I would like to work on that, although I don't think it's a priority. > > > > Thanks, > >> Marius > >> > >> > >>> Wiki Management: What's the difference between "Multipage Export" from > >>> the > >>> Quality section, "Multipage Export UI" and "Better Wiki Import/Export"? > >>> > >>> What kind of user are you: What does "developer" mean? Is it a > committer > >>> developing the XWiki platform itself, or idoes it refer to external > users > >>> that develop applications on top of XWiki for their own wikis / for > their > >>> employers? > >>> > >>> We should include a final big textarea where users can write any > comments > >>> they'd like to share with us. > >>> > >>> > >>> In general: > >>> - too many abbreviations > >>> - I'd link most of the items to their associated Jira issue or design > >>> page, > >>> if they have one > >>> - some items are too cryptic or broad, like "Messaging UI" or "Improve > >>> print > >>> option", while others are too long, like "New data model for accessing > >>> and > >>> manipulating XWiki entities (needed for nested spaces for ex, global > >>> versioning, rights on XObjects, translations on XObjects, etc)" > >>> > >> > > > > -- > > Sergiu Dumitriu > > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > ______________________________**_________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs< > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > > > > > > -- > Benjamin Lanciaux > Marketing XWiki > Skype : benjaminxwiki > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
