On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:40, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Caleb James DeLisle
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to switch filesystem attachments to begin using the persistent
> storage directory now instead of the work directory.
> > This means there's a new way of calculating where the attachments will
> be stored so it might fail on upgrade.
> > I would like to not do any migration and just add to the release notes
> because:
> > #1, it doesn't cause any permanent harm so long as nobody adds
> attachments while it's in what is an obviously broken state.
> > #2 administrators who have FS attachments enabled are probably going to
> know what's going on.
> > #3 migration code is scary, it requires lots of work and lots of review
> and even if it works,
> > people might feel violated having files shuffled around on their system
> without their permission.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> +1 and +1 for no migration by default too. If admin did his job
> properly, work dir and permanent dir are supposed to be the same
>

I do not fully agree. My work dir has always been been stored in a place
like /var/cache, where the data is not backup and has not real importance
(I was not using filesystem attachement obviously). This was the default on
a debian install. On the other hand, permanentDirectory should be in
/var/lib, and be backed up. This is my setup right now with the patch of
Caleb.


> anyway and if the permanent dir is not set then admin just need to set
> it and it OK.
>
> >
> > Caleb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to