+1 On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > I see that we keep adding stuff regularly to oldcore and the reason is "my > code depends on oldcore so I cannot depend on oldcore in new modules". > > First, this is not completely true. We have several modules that already > depend on oldcore. > > Also we cannot wait indefinitely that the new model magically appears (that > won't happen… :)). > > I think it's fine to depend on oldcore when a new module requires to use the > model and when the bridge (DAB) is not enough. However we need to be careful > about one thing: that oldcore itself doesn't use that new module. So > sometimes it will mean extracting stuff from oldcore into a separate module > so that it can use the other new module ;) > > Personally I now think we need to continue splitting oldcore and it's more > important that we create new modules for specific domains, even if they use > old code and even if they use the com.xpn namespace when moving oldcode) than > keep everything as it is and make oldcore grow fatter… > > Of course sometimes it may just be too complex but at least we should > consider it and when possible create new modules depending on oldcore. > > WDYT? > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
