On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Mortagne
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I was starting to look at what to modify and I found that we are
>>> really not consistent right now: most of the Java code in oldcore like
>>> XWikiAction are using absolute URL but all VM I could see (and I guess
>>> it's the same for the wiki pages) send relative URLs.
>>>
>>> So using absolute URL for send redirect is very far from being a rule
>>> right now. It also mean that making it configurable is going to be a
>>> pain since none of the .vm and wiki page are going though some common
>>> redirect oriented URL generator like most Java code do.
>>>
>>> Here is a proposal:
>>> * introduce a configuration but use it only in
>>> XWikiDocument#getURL(String action, String params, boolean redirect,
>>> XWikiContext context) (that's the method where pretty much all Java
>>> code go trough when asking for a redirect URL)
>>
>> There is also api.XWiki.getRequestURL() used with xredirect query
>> string parameter, at least for the login and logout URLs. We should
>> either add an API to get the relative form of the current request URL
>> or change api.XWiki.getRequestURL() to take into account the
>> configuration you're proposing. I prefer the later.
>
> I don't agree here, api.XWiki.getRequestURL() is supposed to return
> the request URL and returning a relative URL would not make much sense
> and would be a major API breackage IMO. If you return a relative URL
> it's not really the request URL anymore.
>
> Now I'm not sure it's that important to force this particular use case
> in a relative URL since what you want is to go back in the exact same
> situation after having done something (like login) and providing the
> request URL as it is probably make more sense that modify it in a
> relative URL to be resolved back by the application server.
>
> WDYT ?

We don't have the "request URL as it is". We compute it using the same
URL factory that creates wrong document external URLs when XWiki is
behind a proxy. So if XWikiDocument#getURL() returns the wrong URL
then XWiki#getRequestURL will do the same.

I'm fine with keeping the current behaviour of XWiki#getRequestURL()
for backward compatibility, but we need an API to get the relative
request URL as well.

Thanks,
Marius

>
>>
>>> * introduce a api.Document#getURL(String action, String queryString,
>>> boolean redirect) method to follow XWikiDocument (from scratch I think
>>> I would prefer getRedirectURL but it's simpler to follow already
>>> existing API for now)
>>> * we can refactor later the .vm and wiki page to support this new
>>> configuration. What's important right now is to allow someone to come
>>> back to old behavior for whatever reason (which sounds a lot less
>>> necessary to me now that I know that we actually use a lot of relative
>>> URL in sendRedirect) but better be safe since it does not cost a lot
>>> here and I plan to introduce this in xwiki.cfg only
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>
>> +1, although I'm also for generating relative URLs whenever it is
>> possible, without any configuration parameter.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Marius
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Thomas Mortagne
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/20/2012 03:39 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In HTTP specifications a redirect is always absolute URL which is
>>>>>> probably why we use absolute URL with sendRedirect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However sendRedirect does not produce direct HTTP response but allows
>>>>>> relative URL and delegate to the application server the job of
>>>>>> producing proper absolute URL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMO XWiki should always use relative URL everywhere it can so I
>>>>>> propose to change our practice to use relative URL instead of absolute
>>>>>> URL with HttpSevletResponse#sendRedirect when possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only reasons I see to use external URLs are:
>>>>>> * interwiki URL in a  domain based multiwiki
>>>>>> * html/pdf export for links pointing on not exported pages or non view
>>>>>> actions
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think this will actually solve the problem.
>>>>
>>>> What problem ? If you are talking about
>>>> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-7632 it did fixed the issue in this
>>>> specific use case as I said on the issue itself.
>>>>
>>>>>As long as XWiki doesn't
>>>>> know the correct URL to use, I doubt that the container will do any 
>>>>> better.
>>>>> I just tested this on Apache HTTPD + mod_proxy_http going to Jetty, and it
>>>>> didn't solve the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Probably mean you did not properly configured your reverse proxy but
>>>> in my use case it was done right.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For the PDF export, all URLs must be external. A relative URL in a PDF
>>>>> doesn't have a base URL to work with, since the PDF is a standalone
>>>>> document. That's why we use a special URLFactory when exporting PDFs.
>>>>
>>>> I know we are using a special URLFactory for pdf export. If a document
>>>> pointing to itself or to another document exported in the same pdf is
>>>> an external URL with sheme/host/port then there is something pretty
>>>> wrong in the pdf export. Anyway that's not really the subject of the
>>>> proposal.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is my +1. We very often fix bugs in the way to produce external
>>>>>> URL and it's still not OK (see
>>>>>> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-7632) so lets reduce the scope for
>>>>>> this need as much as possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>>>>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devs mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devs mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to