Le 13 avr. 2012 à 17:27, Jean-Vincent Drean a écrit : >> This appears to have been made at >> https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/commit/1837196f0f6434603c4c24a13b7c1e2330750de8 >> as part of a "code cleanup". Jean-Vincent, or someone else, could you >> explain the rationale behind it? I am sure this was checked for "others >> usages" but Curriki was not considered as part of that. > > I had forgotten I did this refactoring/cleanup.
This is long ago! We're getting awake! > It seems I wrongly considered those APIs as internal, this is indeed a > regression. I'll fix it ASAP. thanks, it is well fixed in 3.5.x and 4.0 branches. >> Having somewhat fixed this on my side by bringing more methods to the >> subclass (for the display of older events), I come to realize that newer >> events are also not of the right type so I'll have to hunt more for >> "compromised subclassing"... >> >> This is rather an API breakage to my taste. >> Has there been a policy about this? >> Could we set-up one? >> I wonder if such a search engine exists that would have indicated that such >> a breakage would have been avoided. > I think clirr is doing this job now. Could we configure it to consider projects such as Curriki? paul _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
