On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Marius, > > What has been the final decision here? > I'm about to need an upgrade to JSON-lib used in Curriki because that library > doesn't stream the json objects out... so I'd better use the same library. > Was Jackson used? JSON.simple? > In the xwiki-4.0 download, I only see json-lib 2.4.
As you can see from https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/commit/ac22d47d0f826c93b019d9a7f6fe1e28d22722f3 I've used json-lib in the end but the JSONTool API (method signatures) is not bound to any JSON implementation so we could change the JSON library later. Hope this helps, Marius > > thanks in advance > > Paul > > Le 14 mars 2012 à 13:14, Marius Dumitru Florea a écrit : > >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> Can't you add a parser function too ? >> >> A parser function needs to return an object: >> >> * either the JSON object from some JSON library, but that means >> binding the Velocity tool to a specific JSON library and I tried to >> avoid this for the moment until we reach an agreement regarding the >> JSON library to use >> * a wrapper for the JSON object from some JSON library to hide the >> JSON implementation, but that's a lot of work and I don't have time >> for it right now >> * a Java object, but for this you need a JSON-Java mapping, which is >> specific to the JSON library used and it requires some work to make a >> generic binding method >> >>> >>> Right now, we have to use groovy for JSON parsing. It would be better to >>> have it in velocity directly, don't you think ? >> >> Yes, but I don't have time for it right now. >> >> Thanks, >> Marius >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Guillaume >>> >>> 2012/3/14 Andreas Jonsson <[email protected]> >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> 2012-03-14 09:08, Marius Dumitru Florea skrev: >>>>> Hi devs, >>>>> >>>>> Following the discussion on >>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2012-March/049889.html I'd like >>>>> to add a JSON Velocity tool that has (for now) just one method: >>>>> >>>>> /** >>>>> * Serialize a Java object to the JSON format. >>>>> * <p> >>>>> * Examples: >>>>> * <ul> >>>>> * <li>numbers and boolean values: 23, 13.5, true, false</li> >>>>> * <li>strings: "one\"two'three" (quotes included)</li> >>>>> * <li>arrays and collections: [1, 2, 3]</li> >>>>> * <li>maps: {"number": 23, "boolean": false, "string": "value"}</li> >>>>> * <li>beans: {"enabled": true, "name": "XWiki"} for a bean that has >>>>> #isEnabled() and #getName() getters</li> >>>>> * </ul> >>>>> * >>>>> * @param object the object to be serialized to the JSON format >>>>> * @return the JSON-verified string representation of the given object >>>>> */ >>>>> public String serialize(Object object) >>>>> >>>>> This method is able to do what both of the initially proposed methods >>>>> were able and it doesn't expose the JSON library used (so that we can >>>>> change it later if we want). I'll use json-lib for the initial >>>>> implementation and we can move to Jackson or other JSON library later. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? I'd like to commit this ASAP. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Marius >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> devs mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>>>> . >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devs mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
