3 -1's so there is definitely plenty of agreement in this case. My understanding is that in "Distribute without legacy modules by default" "distribute" means "distribute [enterprise and manager]", which would make this a reversal of the agreement voted upon here: http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2012-April/050386.html
At any rate I am curious as to whether the community wants to ever remove anything. If we want to get to the point of removing things then I want to help, if we don't want to then I will accept it. The way I see it, breaking API and removing code is like taking out the garbage. When you do it, you stink and nobody is your friend. If you don't do it, everything stinks but it does so a little at a time. It seems to work reasonably well.. Oracle, Sun and Microsoft have been doing it for years. All I care about is that we have a plan, if we want to remove stuff then lets make it happen, if we want to never remove anything then lets make it a conscious decision. I don't like the idea of having the decision make itself while we put it off. Caleb On 05/23/2012 06:09 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Could they be shipped but deactivated by default? > And let the EM activate them? Sounds normal for an EM job though I agree it's > an extra work. > Making it visible is a good way to encourage the people to upgrade their > extensions or make them "visible is old grumps". > > paul > > > Le 23 mai 2012 à 10:34, Thomas Mortagne a écrit : > >> -1 too, not bundling at least core extensions legacy modules will make >> EM more or less unusable for many extension older than the current >> version right now. >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Marius Dumitru Florea >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Caleb, >>>> >>>> On May 22, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Caleb James DeLisle wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I understand we agreed in >>>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/pipermail/devs/2012-March/050172.html to stop >>>>> bundling legacy modules by default. What was not so clear is how we >>>>> should do this. >>>>> >>>>> I want to remove the modules from XE and Manager, and document the method >>>>> of downloading them from >>>>> maven.xwiki.org and replacing the existing .jar files with them. >>>> >>>> It's not enough IMO. Here's a likely scenario: >>>> >>>> * Users will download the version without legacy modules. >>>> * Then they'll use the Extension Manager to install extensions from >>>> extensions.xwiki.org >>>> * The extensions will fail >>>> * Users will ditch xwiki since it just doesn't work and the quality is >>>> perceived as not good enough. >>>> >>>> We need to solve this before we can stop bundling the legacy modules IMO. >>>> >>>>> Why: >>>>> >>>>> #1. Not removing API is obviously unsustainable in the long term. >>>>> >>>>> #2. Replacing core .jar files has been judged to be beyond the scope of >>>>> the extension manager. >>>>> Whether we want to support overriding classes using extensions as a >>>>> "function hooking" mechanism is a possible topic for future discussion. >>>>> >>>>> #3. Replacing .jar files in the .war is not an excessively complex task, >>>>> we ask users to open the >>>>> war file for configuring a database or adding JDBC connectors, cases >>>>> where there is much less >>>>> technical need to require opening the .war file. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Here's my +1 to remove it ASAP, for 4.1M2 if we can get the tests passing. >>>> >>> >>>> -1 till we solve the question above. I'd rather keep legacy modules than >>>> have dissatisfied users. >>> >>> -1 for the same reason. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marius >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> -Vincent >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Caleb >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> devs mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >>> _______________________________________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs >> >> >> >> -- >> Thomas Mortagne >> _______________________________________________ >> devs mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
