I know, I wasn't expecting magic to happen over night. A smooth base is welcomed, steps ahead on a designer friendly path are a plus for sure. Glad to see all the support thus far.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/18/2012 05:21 AM, Ionut Maxim wrote: > >> Good day, >> >> One of the strongest "as-sure-as-possible" +1 I ever had to share with >> you. >> >> Fully on board since I tried this on my own and ran into a few issues when >> I tried to go beyond the basics. >> >> Let me know if and how I can contribute to this, for me it's close to a >> Christmas present: it would allow to deploy a series of essential / >> classic >> extensions and be able to both suggest and implement on my own solutions >> based on the plethora of plugins based on jQ. >> >> Thank you Jerome for the initiative! >> > > Well, even if jQuery will be bundled in the platform, this doesn't mean > that we'll start using it. It's just there for third party extension > writers, but for the official platform Prototype will continue to be the > official library, at least for the short future. > > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> +1 as well, jQuery the de facto standard for many web applications today. >>> >>> Guillaume >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Andreas Jonsson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> /Andreas >>>> >>>> 2012-06-16 02:28, Jerome Velociter skrev: >>>> >>>> Hi devs, >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Now that all the scripts on the Internets are implemented as jQuery >>>>> plugins, should we bite the bullet and make it easier for extensions >>>>> developers to integrate such scripts ? >>>>> Note it would not necessarily mean we use it ourselves in web/XE. >>>>> >>>>> If we don't do something about it, there is the risk that many >>>>> >>>> extensions >>> >>>> bring their own jQuery to the party, which will translate in slower page >>>>> loads and more importantly a less enjoyable extension developer >>>>> experience. >>>>> >>>>> An alternative idea would be an "official" jQuery extension (with a >>>>> JSX) >>>>> that other extensions can depend upon, should they need jQuery. >>>>> >>>>> What do you think ? >>>>> >>>>> Jerome >>>>> >>>> > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > > > ______________________________**_________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs<http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > -- Ionut MAXIM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Web Designer @ XWiki SAS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +40755120711 | www.xwiki.com _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
