On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Solichin <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Jerome, friends, > > > * Would it make sense to use <aside> for the right sidebar ? > > The aside is actually only for the comments, attachments, history and info > sections of the sidebar only. The reason behind this is that according to > html5 specs: > > > > The aside element represents a section of a page that consists of content > that is tangentially related to the content around the asideelement, and > which could be considered separate from that content. Such sections are > often represented as sidebars in printed typography. ( > http://html5doctor.com/understanding-aside/) > > which I thought is appropriate for those sections. > Ok make sense > > > > > * I've seen you've used <article> as an overall wrapper. Wouldn't > <section> > > be more appropriate, with articles implemented within the content of the > > document ? (BTW this leads to the question of how this would translate in > > wiki syntax. So far there is no such notion built right in - though .it > > could be implemented with macros). > > The reason I used article as an overall wrapper for the "main content" (the > stuff with the white background), according to the html5 specs: > > > > "The article element represents a component of a page that consists of a > self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and > that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable, e.g. in > syndication. This could be a forum post, a magazine or newspaper article, a > blog entry, a user-submitted comment, an interactive widget or gadget, or > any other independent item of content." ( > http://html5doctor.com/the-article-element/) > > I thought this is appropriate since the entire "main content" is the self > contained part of the page that can be independent of the other parts (like > menu, asides, sidebars etc.) > The use of section I thought is appropriate because each gadgets is in a > way a section/part of the overall article, and of the sidebar. > > > > "The section element represents a generic document or application > section" (http://html5doctor.com/the-section-element/) > > These are just my thoughts on the components of a webpage of xwiki, > however. Do you think this is not the correct interpretation of the xwiki > parts? > Make sense too. My concern was about leaving enough room for application developers (whose canvases are XWiki documents) to present their own semantics. For example a blog application could want to present a list of <article>. But maybe nesting <article> inside a main <article> element is just fine. Any thoughts ? Jerome > Thanks for looking into the code! > Jonathan Solichin > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > -- Jérôme Velociter Winesquare http://www.winesquare.net/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
