Thanks !
No problem ...

2012/9/13 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:
>
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>>> 2012/9/2 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>> I could successfully deploy mail archive artifacts to nexus staging !
>>>>
>>>> Would someone kindly promote it ? :)
>>
>> Hi, just to recall that to you ... :)
>> (I know, seems a bit of a rush on 4.2 cycle and there is no urgency on
>> my side, just want to avoid moving too deep in the mailing-list)
>
> Done! Sorry for the lag…
>
> -Vincent
>>
>> 2012/9/2 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>> (groupId : org.xwiki.contrib.mailarchive, version : 0.1, artifacts
>>> xwiki-contrib-mail, xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-api,
>>> xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-ui)
>>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeremie
>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jeremie
>>>>
>>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>> Wow, eventually, it worked ... Had to switch to using
>>>>> maven-release-plugin last version (2.3.2) instead of the one from
>>>>> xwiki.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I'm ... back to the initial issue with the enforcer :
>>>>>
>>>>>    [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EvaluateBeanshell failed with
>>>>> message:
>>>>>    Couldn't evaluate condition: ("pom" != "jar") || ("pom" == "jar"
>>>>> && new 
>>>>> java.io.File("C:\PRIVATE\Dropbox\MAILARCHIVE\target\checkout\target/xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1-javado
>>>>> c.jar").exists())
>>>>>    [INFO] 
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Grrrr !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>> I eventually was able to use push to git from maven with release
>>>>>> plugin (had to reinstall git with more preservative options).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But previous issue is still there: when checking-out my tag from local
>>>>>> clone in target/checkout, pom.xml files are not there so there's
>>>>>> nothing to build for maven ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2012/9/1 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>> Progressing but still failing ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... it's like a nightmare.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I gave up pushing to github from maven, I think there's something
>>>>>>> wrong with windows/mysysgit/cygwin somehow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now trying to release tag "xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1":
>>>>>>> - it's pushed on github
>>>>>>> - if I download the related zip (in "tag" tab on github), it's complete
>>>>>>> - if I "release:perform" from maven, target/checkout folder contains
>>>>>>> everything except pom.xml files ... of course release fails
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How can my pom.xml files be deleted when running "git checkout
>>>>>>> xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1", while I can see them in my local
>>>>>>> history and on github ???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2012/8/31 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>> I tried both, but not tried exhaustively possible combinations
>>>>>>>> (ssh/https, maven/git conf, and my network proxy that comes in the way
>>>>>>>> ...)
>>>>>>>> BTW I'm not sure about how credentials for github should be fed to
>>>>>>>> maven depending on SSH/HTTPS url connection used.
>>>>>>>> Authentication with keys works from git command-line to push to
>>>>>>>> github, but I think I miss some configuration maven-side.
>>>>>>>> Actually from maven "git push" time-outs, or freezes forever,
>>>>>>>> depending on protocol used.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2012/8/31 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Community,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to release my contrib project to nexus staging but having
>>>>>>>>>> difficulties.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Couldn't manage to "git push" correctly from maven to github (though
>>>>>>>>>> "git push" command-line works), so I use "-DpushChanges=false" during
>>>>>>>>>> release:prepare and release:perform, and do a "git push" manually
>>>>>>>>>> after release:prepare.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You sure you <scm> is right ? I see you indicated the https in
>>>>>>>>> <developerConnection>, you should probably use the ssh one instead.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now getting that during release:perform (***** were added, it's a
>>>>>>>>>> correct path behind) :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    [INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0.1:enforce
>>>>>>>>>> (enforce-javadoc-exists) @ xwiki-contrib-mailarchive ---
>>>>>>>>>>    [WARNING] Rule 0:
>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.EvaluateBeanshell failed with
>>>>>>>>>> message:
>>>>>>>>>>    Couldn't evaluate condition: ("pom" != "jar") || ("pom" == "jar"
>>>>>>>>>> && new 
>>>>>>>>>> java.io.File("C:\*****\target\checkout\target/xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1-javadoc.jar").exists())
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Of course javadoc does not exist at this level, as I'm trying to
>>>>>>>>>> release from root aggregator. What I don't understand is why the
>>>>>>>>>> enforcer rule fails ? Aggregator is of type "pom" as expected.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My command-line was:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mvn release:perform -DpushChanges=false
>>>>>>>>>> -DconnectionUrl=scm:git:https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/xwiki-application-mailarchive.git
>>>>>>>>>> -Dtag=xwiki-contrib-mailarchive-0.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/17 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vincent,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that, no problem I'll update the groupId before doing the 
>>>>>>>>>>> release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/16 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremie,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In case you haven't followed we've updated the contrib rule for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the maven group id, see
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be great if you could update your groupid before you do 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Vincent & Sergiu,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, is it ok if I put docs to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/MailArchive/Documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and others in same space) ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> By now I've almost finished writing first versions of:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.Documentation (home page)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.UserGuide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.AdminGuide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.OperationsGuide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * MailArchive.TroubleShooting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should be able to release 0.1 soon ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/13 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Vincent Massol 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jeremie and all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Back from holidays too :) Cool to see progress on this!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok I've parsed this thread and here's my take:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA: I'll create a dedicated JIRA project since the project 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seems large enough to warrant it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok, Thomas is doing it ATM, should be ready real soon :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Done, http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XMAILARCH. You should have the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rights to do pretty much anything in this project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Documentation: our rule is currently to have pages on 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extensions.xwiki.org and if the project becomes too large to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create a dedicated wiki for it, as we've done for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering.xwiki.org, commons.xwiki.org, enterprise, etc for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example (see 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/WebHome). IMO 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's ok ATM to have several pages on e.x.o for the MailArchive 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application and we can decide later on to move it to its own 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki (after we have a 1.0 released IMO).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Nexus: I'll create an account for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see you already have a user, cool.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 10, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd say that:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There should be some documentation on the extension page, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description of the project, some usage scenarios, some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screenshots, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of the features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I agree that the full documentation should be included in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same full documentation should also be available 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki seems to be the right place (in a dedicated 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's the best solution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the space I currently use for the main pages of my app 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "MailArchive", I would propose to use the same for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space and put pages under:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/MailArchive/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That way publishing the doc online to contrib wiki would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straightforward with selective import.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Br,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/9 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/09/2012 10:38 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 08/09/2012 04:34 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Humm ... Just thinking I might put that directly inside my 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> app xar ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm a big fan of self-documenting applications. It has the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage of always offering documentation matching the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version in use.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But you might also want to offer the latest released version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation online. I think there are some extensions 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation that spans several pages, but honestly I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is something we want/we agreed upon. I'll leave it to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bring more information on this subject. There is the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which could be a candidate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen extensions with a lot of documentation on their 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extension page,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and I've seen things documented in several places. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> huge extension pages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So I'd say that:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - There should be some documentation on the extension page, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> description of the project, some usage scenarios, some 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> screenshots, and a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list of the features
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - I agree that the full documentation should be included in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the application
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - The same full documentation should also be available 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> online, and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contrib wiki seems to be the right place (in a dedicated 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> space)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2012/8/9 Jeremie BOUSQUET <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Jerome,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another thing about this project: I'd like to prepare 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particularly the user guide part, so it's available when 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll publish
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the extension.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For this particular use-case though, I'd like to extend 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the user/admin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guide part on more than one page, as it may be quite 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where should I put these pages ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremie
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to