On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi devs, >> >> In order to automate the update of extensions imported from >> https://github.com/xwiki/ we need to have nothing to modify when an >> import is done. >> >> The last remaining thing is the name on which there is a debate is the >> name. Right now the name we have in our maven project looks like >> "XWiki Commons - Extension - Repository - Maven" so that's what we get >> when importing this project or when viewing it in EM UI. >> >> Some of us want to keep this idish name for Maven build but don't like >> it when displaying extension. I recently introduced a way to overwrite >> some extension related informations like the name based on properties. >> >> So here are the choices we have: >> >> 1) Do nothing which mean display "XWiki Commons - Extension - >> Repository - Maven" in EM UI and extensions.xwiki.org >> 2) Change our naming in Maven <name> property for it to be more a name >> than an id that would looks good in EM UI >> 3) Keep the same naming for Maven <name> and overwrite it everywhere >> using <xwiki.extension.name> property >> >> So, WDYT ? >> >> The one that makes the more sense to me is 2) so my +1 goes to this >> one. Frankly I don't care too much having the current id based display >> of the summary of built modules in Maven build and I personally won't >> have any issue to know what name correspond to what project (but >> that's because I know them well, I can understand new dev could be a >> bit more lost). >> >> Then: >> * +0 for 3) to +0 (I don't like too much having this special case >> everywhere in our Maven pom.xml) >> * -0 for 1) (I agree that it does not looks very nice as a display name). > > Exactly the same as Thomas for me. I'd really like if we could find a > solution that works for 2). Even in Maven it's supposed to be a name, i.e. > something readable, not an id… Now even with 2) we would still need a naming > rule and have some concise name.
Of course but I wanted to keep the (display name) naming discussion separated. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
