Hi Ludovic, On Oct 10, 2012, at 3:39 PM, Ludovic Dubost <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why would script services be internal ? They should have a stable API > shouldn't they ? Yes, I agree, each Script Service should define an interface and implement it in addition to implementing ScriptService. We've been lazy and we should fix this as otherwise CLIRR won't let us know when we break scripting APIs. > Ludovic > > 2012/10/10 Marius Dumitru Florea <[email protected]> > >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Ludovic Dubost <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I found an issue with the maven project to generate the javadocs for >>> SRD. Apparently all the internal packages are ignored. This is normal and good. We don't want to show these to the user. Thanks -Vincent >>> This is no necessarly a problem unless we want them in the javadocs. >>> Now there is a problem as some APIs are in internal, which does not >>> seem normal. >>> >>> This is the case of: >>> >>> org.xwiki.officeimporter.internal.script.OfficeImporterScriptService >>> >> org.xwiki.officeimporter.internal.openoffice.script.OpenOfficeManagerScriptService >>> org.xwiki.office.viewer.internal.DefaultOfficeViewerScriptService >> >> Most of our script services are internal. For the office module I need >> to create a single script service (hint=office) with 3 methods >> getImporter(), getManager() and getViewer(). >> >> Thanks, >> Marius >> >>> >>> Until we find a solution i've reverted to the javadocs manually >>> generated (without the maven project). >>> >>> Ludovic _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
