On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Jerome Velociter <jer...@velociter.fr>wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 06:15 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > >> +1 and yes we should not move LucenePlugin since it will break all >> existing >> xwiki.cfg >> > > Yes I guess this is the safe thing to do. Note that we sometimes break > xwiki.cfg : for example when we retire a plugin. > Sure but in this case it just produce a log, it does not really have any real effect. > > Jerome > > >> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Jerome Velociter <jer...@velociter.fr >> >wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Right now all code in the lucene plugin is exposed as API while almost >>> none of it is actual API. >>> I would like to move all lucene plugin classes to an internal package, >>> except for "LucenePluginApi". For the non API "LucenePlugin", I'm not >>> sure, >>> since moving it would break users conf (xwiki.cfg). >>> >>> WDYT ? >>> >>> My +1, >>> Jerome >>> ______________________________****_________________ >>> devs mailing list >>> devs@xwiki.org >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/****mailman/listinfo/devs<http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs> >>> <http://**lists.xwiki.org/mailman/**listinfo/devs<http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> >>> > >>> >>> >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > devs mailing list > devs@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/**mailman/listinfo/devs<http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs> > -- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
