+1 People are used to dealing with dependency messes and you can shade but you can't unshade hence junit-dep. I was thinking this would be an interesting target for experimenting with gcj since a native executable is useful to non java users and "start a jvm for each page load" is a non-starter.
Thanks, Caleb On 12/04/2012 01:10 PM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi devs, > > I'd like to propose that we stop shading Rendering Standalone. The reasons > are: > > 1) It's far from perfect. For example we have at least 3 libs we cannot shade: > > <!-- We don't relocate the following packages since they cause > runtime issues: > - javax.xml > - org.w3c > - org.apache.xerces > --> > > > 2) As we added some libs to our deps we forgot to relocate them so right now > we don't shade (to cite a few): com.steadystate.css, javax.validation, ant, > aspectj, slf4j, etc > 3) There are lots of resources coming from dependent jars and those are not > shaded. For example: > > 283 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 javacc.class > 286 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 jjdoc.class > 235 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 jjtree.class > 0 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 org/xwiki/shaded/javacc/ > > or > > 3783 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 > org/xwiki/shaded/javacc/utils/JavaFileGenerator.class > 3693 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/CharStream.template > 15990 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/JavaCharStream.template > 867 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/MultiNode.template > 1317 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/Node.template > 5962 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/ParseException.template > 12711 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/SimpleCharStream.template > 3227 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/SimpleNode.template > 4005 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/Token.template > 368 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/TokenManager.template > 4244 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 templates/TokenMgrError.template > 48 Tue Dec 04 18:50:42 CET 2012 version.properties > > So I'd like to keep a standalone distribution to make it easy to test XWiki > Rendering but without any shading. > > Here's my +1 > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
