On 12/08/2012 09:12 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > Hi devs, > > This week end I've been (at last) experimenting with Mockito > (http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html) and > it's been successful so far :) > > I've converted a first test to use it as a demonstrator of its power > (http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XCOMMONS-316): > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-commons/commit/7b45b48de1c6915294736dfddda7479213e754fd > > I'd like to propose to start using it and start writing our tests with it > since: > * It's very easy to use. I was able to very simply migrate an existing test > to it > * It makes our tests much more readable to read and maintain IMO because 1) > there's less boilerplate code, 2) it provides default values for mocks and 3) > no more of ugly expectations syntax > * It's powerful, just see > http://docs.mockito.googlecode.com/hg/latest/org/mockito/Mockito.html > * It's actively maintained and developed, see > http://code.google.com/p/mockito/downloads/list and > http://code.google.com/p/mockito/source/list and > http://code.google.com/p/mockito/people/list > > After we've written/converted a few tests (let's say in 1 month or so) we can > really decide if we like it and make it our official mocking tool or if we > should go back to JMock (but I have little doubts ;)). > > WDYT?
Looks good, +1. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
