Ok I removed them. Thought about something, is that main problem is if someone wants to install it manually, ie without the Extension Manager, he would have to retrieve the transitive dependencies "by hand". But as my target is XE 4.X, I'm wondering if it's useful anyway to allow users installing such extension manually, as it's faaar more easy using EM.
2012/12/7 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > 2012/9/14 Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > On Sep 14, 2012, at 9:13 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I guess I have to create an extension page for each artifact ? (mail > > > > extension, mailarchive api extension, mail archive ui extension) > > > > Didn't had time to test within extension repository manager locally, > > > > so I hope it'll work ! :) > > > > > > No don't create one per artifact. To start with I'd suggest just one > for > > > the UI module. The other artifacts are already in an extension > repository > > > since they're in maven.xwiki.org ;) > > > > > > Thanks > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > > Back to this, since I didn't see that recommendation, at that time I > > created 3 extension pages for the 3 modules (and not only for UI): > > (UI) > > > > > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/MailArchive+Application > > (mail api) > > > > > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/MailArchive+Mail+Module > > (mail archive api) > > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/MailArchive+Module > > > > As the last 2 do not really need to be materialized in > > extensions.xwiki.org, > > and lead to more maintenance from my side, and more confusion on users > > side, I would like to remove these 2 pages from extensions.xwiki.org, > and > > move some of their content to the Design page related to the MailArchive > > Application. > > > > Since those 2 were already published, from users point of view it means 2 > > extensions will "disappear" from the catalog. > > So I wanted to check with you if it's not a bad practice to do that, and > if > > I can safely remove those 2 extensions (according to the fact, also, that > > the whole thing is tagged as "BETA"). > > > > There is no official practice on this yet. IMO you can do this is you think > it's the cleaner like this. > > It's not going to break anything for users unless there is other extensions > depending of these extensions in which case they won't be able to install > them of course. > > > > Thanks, > > Jeremie > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > -- > Thomas Mortagne > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
