+1 for 1) On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi devs, > > We have a problem ATM since we bundle both ASM 3.1 and 4.0 at the same time > in XWiki. > > See http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XE-1269 > > We have to take some decisions: > > 1) We say that we don't support indexing .class files in attachments at the > moment (we open a jira for it so that we don't forget to fix it later on) and > we open an issue on the tika parser tracker to migrate to ASM 4.X. We follow > that issue and when they add support for it we upgrade to it. > 2) I put back pegdown 1.0.2 (we're on 1.2.1) but that means changing code and > removing features since they have implemented new features since 1.0.2 (they > have released 3 versions since then). I don't like this. > 3) We modify Tika parser sources so that it works with ASM 4.0 and we publish > in our maven repo. It's like 1) but we do the work. > > Personally I think that 3) is too much work for the benefits so I would go > for 1). > > WDYT? Any other idea? > > I'm voting 1 (i.e. ASM 4.0) > > Thanks > -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
-- Thomas Mortagne _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
