Hi,

On Jan 13, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi devs,
> 
> Initially I didn't activate the resource skin extensions plugins (jsrx
> and ssrx) for security considerations, since they can be used to read
> any file from the classpath. I had forgotten to work on that, and now
> they have been enabled and used in their current implementation for a
> while. This means that changing the behavior will cause backward
> incompatibilities...
> 
> So, I'm proposing that all skin resources packaged inside Jars should
> reside under the /skinx/ root directory. This prefix shouldn't be
> included in the pulled URL, it will be appended internally, and enforced
> to prevent any /skinx/../privateresource tricks.
> 
> For example:
> 
> $xwiki.jsrx.use('/gmaps/gmaps.js')
> 
> will look for /skinx/gmaps/gmaps.js inside jars and the /classes/ directory.
> 
> As a migration plan I'd like to implement this check ASAP, add a
> configuration for enabling the old behavior (if no resource was found
> with the skinx prefix, search without the prefix), which should be set
> to true by default in 4.5. Trigger a warning (in the logs) when such a
> deprecated resource is found. For 5.0 we switch to false by default, and
> in 6.0 we remove the switch completely.
> 
> WDYT?

Another solution which comes to mind is to define a java policy file and forbid 
access outside the webapp root by default (allow the tmp dir, the data dir, 
etc). It's a bit more complex to set up but it is also more secure for the 
user, more generic and I believe we'll need to do that at some point anyway.

Thanks
-Vincent



_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to