Hi,

I've published a migration plan:

http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/L10N/L10NMigrationPlan

Review welcome

Ludovic


2013/1/24 Ludovic Dubost <[email protected]>

> FYI, here are the running times of these queries:
>
> mysql> create table l10n_stats_author as select year(xwr_date)*100+
> month(xwr_date) as l10n_month, XWR_AUTHOR as l10n_author, count(distinct
> XWR_DOCID, XWR_VERSION1, XWR_VERSION2) as l10n_count from xwikircs group by
> 1,2;
> Query OK, 763 rows affected (1 min 28.36 sec)
> Records: 763  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
>
> mysql>   delete from l10n_stats_author where l10n_month=201301 or
> l10n_month=201302;
> Query OK, 29 rows affected (0.00 sec)
>
> mysql>   insert into l10n_stats_author (select year(xwr_date)*100+
> month(xwr_date) as l10n_month, XWR_AUTHOR as l10n_author, count(distinct
> XWR_DOCID, XWR_VERSION1, XWR_VERSION2) as l10n_count from xwikircs where
> xwr_date >= '2012-12-01' group by 1,2);
> Query OK, 35 rows affected (0.07 sec)
> Records: 35  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0
>
> Update is very fast
>
> Ludovic
>
>
> 2013/1/24 Ludovic Dubost <[email protected]>
>
>> The custom statistics data structure is not that complicated.
>> I've already the SQL query that does the initial version (based on
>> xwikircs for now)
>>
>>   create table l10n_stats_author as select year(xwr_date)*100+
>> month(xwr_date) as l10n_month, XWR_AUTHOR as l10n_author, count(distinct
>> XWR_DOCID, XWR_VERSION1, XWR_VERSION2) as l10n_count from xwikircs group by
>> 1,2;
>>   delete from l10n_stats_author where l10n_month=201301 or
>> l10n_month=201302;
>>   insert into l10n_stats_author (select year(xwr_date)*100+
>> month(xwr_date) as l10n_month, XWR_AUTHOR as l10n_author, count(distinct
>> XWR_DOCID, XWR_VERSION1, XWR_VERSION2) as l10n_count from xwikircs where
>> xwr_date >= '2012-12-01' group by 1,2);
>>   select * from l10n_stats_author where l10n_month=201301 or
>> l10n_month=201302;
>>
>>
>> Putting this in a scheduler job should not be complicated
>>
>> Ludovic
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/1/24 Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>
>>
>>> On 01/24/2013 12:03 AM, Ludovic Dubost wrote:
>>> > Working on l10n change to custom mapping showed up an issue with the
>>> l10n
>>> > history.
>>> > We have a huge history table with 2,3M lines (as well as an activity
>>> > stream) and we use the history table for extracting contributor
>>> statistics.
>>> >
>>> > However looking at it more closely shows that the source of most data
>>> in
>>> > the history table is useless.
>>> > See here a grouping by dates showing that localisation of already
>>> close to
>>> > 2M lines in 6 month in 2012.
>>> >
>>> > |                             201201 |   318346 |
>>> > |                             201202 |   311403 |
>>> > |                             201203 |   728703 |
>>> > |                             201204 |   271657 |
>>> > |                             201205 |   296384 |
>>> > |                             201206 |   120463 |
>>> >
>>> > Here is an example of history for an entry
>>> >
>>> > mysql> select
>>> >
>>> xwr_author,xwr_version1,xwr_version2,xwr_date,xwr_comment,cast(xwr_isdiff
>>> > as unsigned), length(xwr_patch) from xwikircs where
>>> xwr_docid=596494851  ;
>>> >
>>> +-----------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------------+-------------+------------------------------+-------------------+
>>> > | xwr_author            | xwr_version1 | xwr_version2 | xwr_date
>>> >  | xwr_comment | cast(xwr_isdiff as unsigned) | length(xwr_patch) |
>>> >
>>> +-----------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------------+-------------+------------------------------+-------------------+
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            1 |            1 | 2010-02-23
>>> 11:38:27
>>> > |             |                            1 |               163 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            2 |            1 | 2010-02-23
>>> 11:40:26
>>> > |             |                            1 |               330 |
>>> > | XWiki.rbuj            |            3 |            1 | 2010-03-04
>>> 00:24:24
>>> > |             |                            1 |               189 |
>>> > | XWiki.rbuj            |            4 |            1 | 2010-03-04
>>> 01:02:52
>>> > |             |                            1 |               223 |
>>> > | XWiki.rbuj            |            5 |            1 | 2010-07-30
>>> 01:12:58
>>> > |             |                            0 |              5026 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            6 |            1 | 2012-01-23
>>> 11:40:25
>>> > |             |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            7 |            1 | 2012-01-23
>>> 11:58:25
>>> > |             |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            1 | 2012-01-23
>>> 13:31:52
>>> > |             |                            1 |               234 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            2 | 2012-01-23
>>> 15:36:02
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            3 | 2012-01-24
>>> 02:01:12
>>> > | Prepared    |                            0 |              5670 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            4 | 2012-01-25
>>> 02:04:00
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            5 | 2012-01-26
>>> 02:02:29
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            6 | 2012-01-27
>>> 02:01:18
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            7 | 2012-02-04
>>> 02:01:08
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            8 | 2012-02-07
>>> 02:02:03
>>> > | Prepared    |                            0 |              5670 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |            9 | 2012-02-08
>>> 02:01:20
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               115 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           10 | 2012-02-14
>>> 02:01:07
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           11 | 2012-02-28
>>> 02:01:32
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           12 | 2012-03-03
>>> 02:01:20
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           13 | 2012-03-14
>>> 02:01:50
>>> > | Prepared    |                            0 |              5671 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           14 | 2012-03-14
>>> 18:23:06
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           15 | 2012-03-14
>>> 18:32:38
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           16 | 2012-03-14
>>> 18:37:17
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           17 | 2012-03-24
>>> 02:01:34
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           18 | 2012-03-26
>>> 16:40:35
>>> > | Prepared    |                            0 |              5671 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           19 | 2012-03-28
>>> 02:01:23
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           20 | 2012-03-29
>>> 02:01:45
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           21 | 2012-04-11
>>> 02:01:36
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           22 | 2012-04-19
>>> 15:20:10
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           24 | 2012-04-29
>>> 02:01:45
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           25 | 2012-05-04
>>> 18:55:30
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           26 | 2012-05-04
>>> 19:02:09
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           27 | 2012-05-10
>>> 02:04:36
>>> > | Prepared    |                            1 |               116 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           28 | 2012-05-30
>>> 02:02:08
>>> > | Prepared    |                            0 |              5671 |
>>> > | XWiki.XWikiTranslator |            8 |           29 | 2012-06-07
>>> 10:44:28
>>> > | Prepared    |                            0 |              5782 |
>>> >
>>> +-----------------------+--------------+--------------+---------------------+-------------+------------------------------+-------------------+
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://l10n.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/XE/XEXWikiCoreResources_2107067965_core-menu-watchlist-add-page_nl?viewer=history&showminor=true
>>> >
>>> > Most entries are "no changes" and have been cause by the L10NUpdater
>>> which
>>> > wrongefully saved the document with no changes. I believe this must
>>> have
>>> > been fixed (by Thomas M.?)  mid 2012.
>>> >
>>> > Now the 2M lines impact performance significantly and loads the DB for
>>> > nothing (and in the activity stream as well).
>>> >
>>> > I suggest we clean up the history and activity stream. We have 2
>>> > possibilities:
>>> >
>>> > For xwikircs:
>>> >
>>> > 1/ Clean up only the bad data from XWikiTranslator when there are no
>>> > changes:
>>> >
>>> > This is complicated as you need to verify if the change is actually a
>>> > change and you cannot do that just with sql queries. It could be very
>>> long
>>> >
>>> > 2/ Clean up old data from pre-201206 from XWikiTranslator
>>> >
>>> > Simpler if it is safe to delete by date in the DB. After discussion
>>> with
>>> > sergui this is a bit complicated because you need to make sure you
>>> don't
>>> > delete the latest full version before the versions you keep. So you
>>> would
>>> > have to do it by API which will take ages.
>>> >
>>> > 3/ Clean up up old data from pre-201206 from all users
>>> >
>>> > This is simpler as you can safely delete from the database everything
>>> older
>>> > than a certain versions. Cleans-up even more but would loose
>>> contributor
>>> > statistics unless we store 2012 contributor counts in an alternate
>>> table
>>> > which would then be regularly updated
>>>
>>> +1 for 3/, without the extra stats table yet. See below.
>>>
>>> Technically, we could also use /2, since we'll still have history
>>> summary (who changed when), but some actual versions won't be
>>> retrievable. Is the actual revision important? IMHO, only if we want to
>>> investigate some foul play.
>>>
>>> > In any case we should probably create this intermediary table for
>>> > statistics as it would be much faster anyway.
>>> >
>>> > For activitystream:
>>> >
>>> > 1/ Clean up old data from XWikiTranslator 201206 or earlier
>>> >
>>> > 2/ Clean up old date from everybody 201206 or earlier
>>>
>>> +1 for 1/
>>>
>>> > What value do we see in the l10n history and actvity stream and which
>>> > solutions do the other commiters suggest ?
>>> >
>>> > I would say it's interesting for contributor statistics (counting
>>> number of
>>> > contribution by translators) but beyond that we can delete the data.
>>> > So we would fix that by storing monthly statistics in a table and
>>> updating
>>> > the latest 2 month through a scheduler job. This means that we can also
>>> > delete history over 2 month.
>>>
>>> We can get contributor activity from the activity stream, independently
>>> from the RCS table. Since the activity stream doesn't have inter-version
>>> dependencies like the RCS does, we can freely discard irrelevant rows
>>> from it, and use the remaining valid data. The same information is
>>> present in the activity stream and in the RCS table: who did what, when,
>>> and where.
>>>
>>> I mean, this is a good fast solution for the moment. We could still make
>>> a custom statistics data structure for translation contributors, but
>>> that would take longer, and thus it delays the migration of the l10n
>>> wiki to a newer version, and delays the performance improvement that
>>> we'd gain by dropping data.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sergiu Dumitriu
>>> http://purl.org/net/sergiu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devs mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ludovic Dubost
>> Founder and CEO
>> Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
>> XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
>> Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ludovic Dubost
> Founder and CEO
> Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
> XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
> Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
>



-- 
Ludovic Dubost
Founder and CEO
Blog: http://blog.ludovic.org/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost GTalk: ldubost
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to