On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 02/12/2013 07:26 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>> 
>> Here's my effort to try to put together all that has been said… :)
>> 
>> The idea is that whenever you change an API (adding a new one or changing an 
>> existing one) you go through the list of strategies below, trying to find 
>> the first that matches your use case.
>> 
>> * Strategy 1 (already in place): Whenever possible don't break backward 
>> compatibility and go through a deprecation mechanism:
>> ** Deprecate classes/methods
>> ** Move them to Legacy modules as soon as our code is not using them anymore
>> ** Note: No need to touch CLIRR
>> 
>> * Strategy 2 (new): If possible, code defensively, i.e. put code in internal 
>> and open up when api is stable later on, either when users ask for it or 
>> when someone feels it's the right time
>> ** Note: No need to touch CLIRR
>> 
>> * Strategy 3 (new): If not possible (for example complete new modules where 
>> you wish to separate what will become stable APIs in the future from 
>> internal code) then use the @Unstable annotation at class level (or method 
>> level)
>> ** Whenever we work on a new N.0 milestone 1 version, review all existing 
>> @Unstable annotation and for those that were added before N-1.0 remove the 
>> annotation
>> ** Exclude the classes/methods marked @Unstable from CLIRR
> 
> I guess this has to be done manually, right?

right

-Vincent

> 
>> * Strategy 4: If the API is stable and the developers wants to break it 
>> (change of signature for example) and all other strategies don't apply, then 
>> either:
>> ** (new) Just do it and modify the CLIRR exclude. Preferable (but not 
>> mandatory) send a NOTICE email to warn others devs that an API is going to 
>> be broken in the next release
>> ** If not sure, send a PROPOSAL or VOTE email depending on how important you 
>> think the API to be broken is
>> 
>> WDYT?
> 
> Sounds good.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to