On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Like Vincent, I do not really think we have thoroughly worked
> our templates. IMO, templates should not be considered a good base for
> implementing UI extension point blindly.
>
> Currently templates were closely linked with our distributed skin. When we
> have introduce Colibri, new templates were added, especially to support the
> new content menu for example, and other were ignored, left over since no
> more useful. Do you consider UI extension point to be closely linked with
> our skin ? What would happen when we implement the bootstrap based skin ?
>

When I look at the list of UIXP I pasted I don't see it closely
related to a specific skin.
Some names are not perfect, but again I don't think we can afford
renaming them (because of our skin overriding mechanism).
What problem do you foresee with a bootstrap based skin ? Would it be
difficult to keep current template names ?

> Just think about the proposal from Cathy, there is no more left panels...

Does the fact that the proposal have a single panel in the left column
means that we should consider dropping the panel feature ?

> but an applications panel or whatever, how do you expect to support
> platform.template.leftpanels.top, platform.template.leftpanels.bottom, what
> would be there meaning ?
>

We could drop leftpanels.vm and rightpanels.vm and make the panel app
hook itself to platform.template.endpage.top.

> For sure doing 1) is harder, but creating truly semantic UIXP could have
> real advantage for maintenance and compatibility of code that use those
> UIXP. So I would really prefer a few initial set of those semantic UIXP to
> start with, than that long list of not necessarily useful  and meaningful
> ones. And, at least, I would like to read more opinion to consider 2).
>

1) is harder and I'm afraid it can start endless discussions :)

JV,
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to