Hi, On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mar 4, 2013, at 4:15 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi devs, > >> > >> I've created a new dashboard for stats about how we fare regarding bugs: > >> http://jira.xwiki.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=10352 > >> > >> Namely there are 3 majors charts (left column shows stats over the whole > >> period of the project while on the right stats are for the last 365 > days): > >> > >> * Created vs Resolved: Show how many bugs were created vs bugs resolved. > >> The blue line shows the evolution of non fixed bugs. We can see that > we've > >> not been good till recently and only recently we're starting to invert > the > >> trend. > >> > >> * Recently Created Chart: The red bars shows how many bugs that were > >> created at given point in time are still open. I'm not sure exactly how > to > >> draw a conclusion from this chart yet… > >> > >> * Average age chart: Shows how long it was taking to fix a bug as an > >> average. For example on 1 Jan 2006 it was taking 184 days average to > get a > >> bug fixed. And on 1st of March 2013 it's now taking 736 days average to > get > >> your bug fixed… This shows how bad we are with bug fixing… By continuing > >> our weekly BFDs, we should see this average age go down normally… We > should > >> also try to pick the oldest bugs first to make it go down faster ;) > >> > > > > Actually it's the other way round. If you close the oldest bugs first, > you > > will add bugs in the list that took a very long time to get fixed, thus > > pushing the average up. > > That's not my understanding: The filter is for all bugs not closed bugs. > Indeed. I was misled by your wording. The chart says "average number of days issues were unresolved", which is different from "average time to get an issue fixed" since it also takes into account issues that have not been fixed yet. Guillaume > Thanks > -Vincent > > > If you want to make that number go down faster, you actually need to > close > > the more recent bugs first... and never close the older ones :-) > > > > Guillaume > > > > > >> WDYT? > >> > >> Any analysis that comes to your mind? > >> > >> For me it means we really needed to start addressing our bugs and that > are > >> weekly BFDs are going in the right direction and starting to have some > >> effects. > >> > >> Thanks > >> -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
