+1 for A)

On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<[email protected]>wrote:

> +1 for A), it's ok to have only wiki editor with the few xwiki/1.0
> documents IMO. Plus the old WYSIWYG have lot of issues so it's almost
> of a feature to disable it even for xwiki/1.0 syntax anyway.
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > Related to the other vote about disabling the xwiki/1.0 syntax [1], I'd
> > like to retire the old WYSIWYG editor. Although there aren't any obvious
> > benefits, on the contrary it, removes an important feature, the
> > advantages for doing this are:
> >
> > - fewer bugs (there are known bugs that we've decided not to fix since
> > we agreed not to maintain it anymore)
> > - less code (the .vm templates that support the editor are really crappy
> > and I'd be very happy to get rid of them completely)
> > - strongly encourages (developer) users to migrate to the new syntax
> > - less non-valid, non-accessible code (standards compliance)
> > - fewer places where XSS holes can hide (security)
> >
> > Personally I'd like to remove it completely, but there's also the option
> > of putting it in a -legacy- module, still enabled in the final releases.
> > This makes two options:
> >
> > A) Move the editor in a xwiki-contrib retired module
> > B) Move the editor in xwiki-platform-legacy-web and leave it enabled
> >
> > My +1 goes for A.
> >
> > [1] http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/6damxrncgohtk4oc
> > --
> > Sergiu Dumitriu
> > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
eGuilde sarl - CTO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to