Branches created and Jenkins updated.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2013, at 5:58 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>> Not sure it's really needed but since it has to be done before a RC why not.
>
> The reason I'm mentioning this is because:
> 1) since I won't be avail tomorrow I've started looking for some simple 
> bugfixes I could still fix and some I've found I would definitely not fix 
> them in a RC… Too risky
> 2) In the past BFD we've almost always had stabilization issues for 1 or 2 
> days after the BFD and since here we're supposed to release Friday…
>
> In any case I think it's important that you decide Thomas since you're the 
> RM. I was just mentioning this mostly to help you and ensure we're not going 
> to push the release once more :)
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>> I can take care of that if nobody is against it.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tomorrow starts BFD#17. Since I'll be travelling I won't be able to 
>>> participate so I wish you a good BFD! :)
>>>
>>> One important remark: We're currently stabilizing 5.0RC1 and I think it 
>>> would be a bad idea to commit BFD bug fixes for RC1 tomorrow.
>>>
>>> I'm proposing instead that we create a stable-5.0.x branch right now from 
>>> master and that master becomes 5.1M1 and that tomorrow we commit on master 
>>> (and backport on the stable-5.0.x branch if we are really sure of the fix 
>>> and we think it's needed for 5.0).
>>>
>>> WDYT? If agreed, who could do this?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to