I'm no big developer, but one of the reasons I changed from Windows to Mac was using the cygwin (the other was testing the UI, but for me Mac was just an over expensive thing). Actually after we migrated to git, I remember to have many problems trying to commit something and I was really relieved to change my OS, but kind of reluctant since we had then many users on Windows (and in my mind I had somehow to share their environment needs).
I would be +1 in order for us to be as accessible as we can regarding developers environments and also because it's shorter and easier to read. I don't know how much work there is, if this is a priority and all the things it will break. It will be very nice to hear some thoughts from other members of our community (I would be very interested also in the opinion of our GSOC students for example, or any other beginner contributor, not necessarily Java and also worldwide). Thanks, Caty On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 16, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 05/16/2013 10:25 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >> I'm rather -0 ATM and very close to -1 because: > >> > >> 1) I haven't heard from a windows dev for a long time, I don't think > that happens that often > > > > Maybe they weren't motivated enough to search for a solution, and just > > gave up? > > > >> 2) It's a *huge* change and it should definitely not be done lightly. > We would need to plan a period like 2 full days, all devs would need to > stop working on what they do and help out. For example all pages on > xwiki.org having some github links are going to be broken and will need > to be updated (that's probably around hunded of pages overall) > > > > So postponing it will solve what? > > No > > >> 3) Windows devs have a simple solution which is to use cygwin so it's > not a blocker > > > > Enforcing a special environment is something we try to avoid as much as > > possible. > > Agreed > > > If the checkout doesn't work out of the box with the user's favorite > > tool, will they have the motivation to search for an explanation, read > > our documentation, set up the "right" tool, and learn to use a new > > environment that's not (perceived to be) as good as what they already > > know and are efficient with? > > > > This is not a "simple" solution, IMHO. XWiki Development should be > > environment-independent. > > Sure but not at all cost. > > For example there are tons of dev environments we don't support. It's not > because they exist that we need to support them. > > We need to remember that these dev envs must be first and foremost to make > the life of those who code a lot for xwiki simpler. > > Supporting more env means more work. It's the same as supporting N > databases or N browsers… > > Right now if we do the sam exercise as we did for the databases and the > browsers we would never support the windows dev environment based on how > many potential devs using windows we have or that we'll get… > > It's a nice to have but far from critical. Again, the only person I know > who asked about this was Florin. And that was in 7 years…. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > >> Thanks > >> -Vincent > >> > >> On May 16, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Reviving http://markmail.org/message/hlnqke3igkbec332 for as an > official vote. > >>> > >>> We have waited way too long and I think we really need to find a > >>> solution even if none of the committers use Windows since a long time. > >>> Every time a Windows dev even think of contributing he is very quickly > >>> discouraged... > >>> > >>> As a reminder the issue is that working on XWiki source code is a pain > >>> for MS Windows developers because of the (impossible to understand I > >>> agree) limitation on path size. > >>> > >>> So the idea is to find a new logical rule to drastically shorten our > >>> paths and Sergiu proposed the following: remove duplicated information > >>> from our paths to maven modules. > >>> > >>> Here is an example: > >>> > >>> > xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-rendering/xwiki-platform-rendering-transformations/xwiki-platform-rendering-transformation-macro > >>> (131 chars) > >>> > >>> would become > >>> > >>> core/rendering/transformations/macro (36 chars) > >>> > >>> So WDYT ? > >>> > >>> Here is my +1 > > > > Big +1 from me. > > > >>> I also find it nicer when navigating using cd and tab in a unix shell > anyway. > >>> > >>> Planning to do it in 5.1 if everyone agree. > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
