Le 8 oct. 2013 18:42, "Sergiu Dumitriu" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > OK, I see, I misread the initial proposal. I thought it could be > something that can package any kind of distribution on top of the XWiki > platform, not just something based on XE. > > +1 for including the -enterprise- part in the name, although I still > slightly prefer to add another part in there, but I'm not sure "product" > is right anymore. > > Maybe xwiki-enterprise-derivate-archetype? -downstream-? -repackaging-?
xwiki-enterprise-custom-archetype ? xwiki-enterprise-xe-archetype ? > > On 10/08/2013 12:25 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote: > > I think there is a misunderstanding due the the first mail that was > > not very clear. > > > > What Vincent did here is not something that creates XWiki > > distributions (for example XE), it's something that create XE > > distributions (something that inherits XE). > > > > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/08/2013 11:15 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >>> > >>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 10/08/2013 10:58 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 10/07/2013 11:23 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi devs, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd like to add an archetype module in xwiki-enterprise so that users can easily extend XE to create their own distributions. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It'll generate a multimodule project with *-web, *-ui, *-data and *-distribution modules (and possibly installers in a second version). > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I remember some users asking for this (e.g. Fabio) and I have the need myself now. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> WDYT? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1, but the name should be more generic, like > >>>>> > >>>>> you mean less generic, not more :) > >>>> > >>>> No, I mean more generic. xwiki-enterprise is too specific, it means > >>>> exactly the XWiki Enterprise product. > >>>> > >>>>>> xwiki-distribution-archetype, because that's what it builds, custom > >>>>>> distributions built on top of XWiki, not enterprises for XWiki. > >>>>> > >>>>> I chose voluntarily to not have xwiki-enterprise-distribution-archetype because it doesn't build distributions. It generates all modules to build a product based on XE. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Right, "product" is the right term. I used "distribution" as a synonym > >>>> of "product" (like a Linux distro) not with the "packaging/installer" > >>>> sense that's used in the actual XE modules. > >>>> > >>>> So, +1 for xwiki-product-archetype. > >>> > >>> Except that all modules in enterprise start with xwiki-enterprise so that would be xwiki-enterprise-product-archetype and I believe it's overkill since there's only 1 archetype ATM. > >>> > >>> If everyone thinks that xwiki-enterprise-product-archetype is better than xwiki-enterprise-archetype, I'll change it. > >> > >> Should that really be a module of xwiki-enterprise? To me it looks like > >> a tool, which could have been used to create xwiki-enterprise itself. > >> > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
