I would say it's a case by case decision (we may want to keep critical
thing like editing a page/objects/class usable without javascript)
with the default being to consider working without javascript an
improvement and not a requirement.

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Caleb James DeLisle <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Of course we always have to move cautiously and remember that DOM structure,
> even if js generated, can be very important to vision impaired users.
>
> Thanks,
> Caleb
>
>
> On 01/07/2014 03:30 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> +1 to officially drop support for non-javascript-enable clients (browsers).
>>
>> Ideally it shouldn’t show an error (not even sure we need to go to that 
>> level) but the feature is allowed to not be present when javascript is not 
>> enabled.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Vincent
>> On 7 Jan 2014 at 15:29:04, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau 
>> ([email protected]) wrote:
>>
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> In a recent pull request
>> (https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/254), I have "fixed" a
>> bug reported by the accessibility validator by hiding a
>> link if javascript is not enabled on the browser. It didn't fix the fact
>> that the feature is unavailable without javascript, but at least the link
>> was not there.
>>
>> I did it because I have the feeling that some committers think we don't
>> need support the navigation without javascript in 2014.
>>
>> Now, it seems that we do not all agree about this.
>>
>> That is why I think we should talk about this to decide what rule we should
>> put in place for the next years.
>>
>> Thanks, in advance, for your opinions.
>>
>> Louis-Marie
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs



-- 
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to