>From what I remember it was added when we created Colibri and was
implemented by Sergiu. Not sure it had anything to do with the WCAG
standard or not.
>From an usability perspective I kind off liked the feature so I'm not sure
about removing it (although I always put titles on my documents).

+0 (if it would improve the performance and if others also think is not an
useful feature)

Thanks,
Caty


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 to move to legacy and to use xwiki.title.compatibility to disable the
> feature.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > 2014-01-30 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Good point with xwiki.title.compatibility I had forgotten about it!
> > >
> > > FTR:
> > >
> > > #-# Defines whether title handling should be using the compatibility
> mode
> > > or not. When the compatibility
> > > #-# mode is active, if the document's content first header (level 1 or
> > > level 2) matches the document's title
> > > #-# the first header is stripped.
> > > xwiki.title.compatibility=1
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > >
> > > On 30 Jan 2014 at 14:16:13, Thomas Mortagne ([email protected]
> > > (mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > > Hi devs,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to propose removing the feature of extracting the title
> from
> > > the content in 6.x.
> > > > >
> > > > > The rationale is:
> > > > >
> > > > > * This is costing more than it should. It needs parsing the
> document
> > > content to get its XDOM and then to traverse it to find Heading blocks.
> > > When we display doc titles in lists (in livetables for example or in
> the
> > > activity stream) it costs a lot to do so.
> > > > >
> > > > > * Our implementation is broken since if you use an include macro
> that
> > > generates a heading for ex, it won't be taken into account since we
> don't
> > > apply transformations ATM when computing the title since it would be
> even
> > > more expensive.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since 6.x is about performance I believe this would be a good step
> > > forward.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now in order to handle backward compatibility. I propose that we:
> > > > > * Add a legacy configuration parameter to keep the behavior (but
> off
> > > by default). This would be in order to let users using this feature
> > convert
> > > their wiki
> > > >
> > > > We could reuse xwiki.title.compatibility for that too maybe.
> > > >
> > > > > * Move the code to a legacy module (I hope it's possible)
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's my +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > -Vincent
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > devs mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > >
> > > > Big plus 1, I always been against keeping this xwiki/1.0 hack. We
> also
> > > > need to put xwiki.title.compatibility back to disabled by default (it
> > > > was initially disabled and then enabled supposedly temporary for
> wrong
> > > > reasons).
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thomas Mortagne
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > devs mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devs mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Denis Gervalle
> SOFTEC sa - CEO
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to