Hello, I remember wanting to propose this 2 years ago, but I can't remember why I didn't do it exactly :)
So, here is my +1 Regards, Sorin B. On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <ser...@xwiki.com> wrote: > +1. FOP developers don't have the time or desire to maintain the RTF > output, so it's unlikely to improve. RTF is a limited format. > > On the other hand it is the only editable file format that XWiki can > provide standalone. Some users do like the ability to get out a document > they can edit, but I guess it's OK to only expose this feature when an > OO backend is configured. > > > On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, vinc...@massol.net wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending > on the reader you use (see for example > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ). > > > > I propose to drop the RTF support without OO > > > > Rationale: > > * If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server > connected to xwiki > > * RTF is not really a mainstream format > > * I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export > > > > Here's my +1 > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > devs@xwiki.org > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
