Hi Clemens, On 14 Feb 2014 at 14:58:33, Clemens Klein-Robbenhaar ([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:
> > > Hi devs, > > > > I’d like to propose a Deprecation Fixing Day for the next XWiki Day, ie for > > the 20 Feb 2014. > > > > The rules I propose: > > > > * On that day, I send the reminder email with inside the # of deprecated > > calls found in Commons, Rendering and Platform. For example right now it’s: > > - Commons: 39 > > (http://sonar.xwiki.org/drilldown/issues/1?&rule=squid%3ACallToDeprecatedMethod&rule_sev=MINOR&severity=MINOR) > > - Rendering: 3 > > (http://sonar.xwiki.org/drilldown/issues/915?&rule=squid%3ACallToDeprecatedMethod&rule_sev=MINOR&severity=MINOR#) > > - Platform: (still being computed, I don’t have a link to give ATM ;)) > > * One goal is to replace calls to deprecated methods by new API calls > > * Another goal is to move deprecated methods and types to legacy modules > > * On that day, I'll prepare a Blog post on xwiki.org (not published) and > > everyone who participates to this day should edit the blog post with his > > score for the day (since it’s hard to compute automatically). There’ll be 2 > > scores for everyone: a score for removed deprecated calls (1 point per > > removal) and a score for types and methods moved to legacy modules (1 point > > per type and method moved). > > > > WDYT? > > > > Good idea. Do deprecated calls in Wiki documents serialised as *.xml also > count? Normally there aren’t any since we normally fail the build in the webstandards functional tests when they happen. Do you have any in mind? :) > I worry a bit about how to avoid two people fixing the same calls > concurrently. > Formally one might be able to achieve this by this workflow: > - before you start on one point, edit the said Blog post, but score yourself > 0 points for the change you want to do > (only after checking that nobody else already did so, of course) > - fix the problem > - afterwards add the correct score to yourself > > However I guess that is just too much red tape, and dropping a line in chat > is good enough to coordinate ? Yes IMO using IRC to coordinate is good enough. Alternatively we could decide to create jira issues with component being “Development issue only” (this component already exists). Thanks -Vincent > Cheers, > Clemens > > > Note that in the future I’d like to expand this to a more generic Violation > > Fixing Day which would be about fixing any type of violations as reported > > by Sonar but before we do this we need to decide which violations we > > consider important and configuration Sonar properly for that. I’ll try to > > propose something on this soon. > > > > Thanks > > -Vincent _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
