+1

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
[email protected]> wrote:

> +1
>
>
> 2014-05-26 14:46 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>:
>
> > s/version/branch/
> >
> > +1, we already apply it in practice
> >
> > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:41 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi devs,
> > >
> > > I’d like to propose that we change our rule of supporting the last 2
> > versions of XWiki (ie the latest stable and the version in development)
> > which is documented here:
> http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support
> > >
> > > The new support rule would be that we support:
> > > * The latest release from the previous development cycle (right now
> > that’s 5.4.5)
> > > * The latest stable release from the current cycle (right now that’s
> > 6.0.1)
> > > * The latest development release from the current cycle (right now
> > that’s 6.1M1)
> > >
> > > The rationale is that we need to offer a super stable release (that’s
> > the latest from the previous dev cycle) for users in production.
> > >
> > > Here’s my +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Vincent
> > >
> > > PS: Note that if we really wanted to support only 2 versions, then I’d
> > propose to drop the “latest stable from the current cycle” (ie 6.0.1
> right
> > now), thus offering only 5.4.5 and 6.1M1 ATM.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devs mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>



-- 
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to