+1

If the extensions have a different license header than the one used by
XWiki, than after the 'donation' the license headers will be replaced.

Question: beside the blame, should we have a standard way to mention
contributors on that extensions? or initial sponsors?

Thanks,
caty


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> On 07/07/2014 12:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi devs,
> >> >
> >> > Following the proposal thread at
> >> http://markmail.org/message/ppw2slpgqou2ihai I’d like to move on and
> I’ve
> >> prepared below a full proposal that I’d like us to VOTE on.
> >> >
> >> > Rationale/Need
> >> > ===============
> >> >
> >> > The needs:
> >> > * Be able to extract some apps from xwiki-contrib that the XWiki Dev
> >> Team would like to maintain. Example: File Manager app developed by
> Marius
> >> when it’ll have had some releases and tests (if it doesn’t have some
> >> already!), GitHub Stats app used on xwiki.org, Meeting Manager App,
> Forum
> >> App, etc
> >> > * Be able to extract some extensions currently located in
> xwiki-platform
> >> but not released with XE so that they can have a different release cycle
> >> (examples: FAQ app, IRCBot extension, JIRA macro, etc). Having different
> >> release cycle allow to release new versions quicker to our users (bug
> >> fixes, new features).
> >> >
> >> > Governance
> >> > ==========
> >> >
> >> > Details:
> >> >
> >> > * Extensions are VOTEd in on a case by case basis.
> >> >
> >> > * Each voted extensions will have its own Git Repository in the
> “xwiki”
> >> organization (so that each extension can be released independently of
> each
> >> other).
> >> >
> >> > * When moving an extension either from xwiki-contrib or from
> >> xwiki-platform, keep its Git history as much as possible or simply
> donate
> >> the repo to the “xwiki" organization.
> >> >
> >> > * FTM extensions bundled by default with XE would still remain in
> XWiki
> >> Commons/Rendering/Platform/Enterprise.
> >> >
> >> > * The Git repository name should be of the form xwiki-<short project
> >> name>. <short project name> should be part of the VOTE.
> >> >
> >> > * All rules from http://dev.xwiki.org apply
> >> >
> >> > * Each extension has a Release Manager defined and he’s responsible
> for
> >> defining its own Roadmap/Release notes (if need be), on the extension
> page
> >> on e.x.o and perform the releases or ensure the extension is released
> >> regularly when there are changes.
> >> >
> >> > * Each extension must follow these criteria for being VOTEd:
> >> > ** A Release Manager needs to be defined in the proposal
> >> > ** The extension must have had several releases already (i.e. someone
> >> wanting to propose a new extensions that doesn’t exist would start in
> >> xwiki-contrib for ex and prove that his extension works and is useful by
> >> doing several releases and creating the pages on e.x.o)
> >> > ** It must follow our best practices defined on http://dev.xwiki.org
> >> (coding practices, tests, etc) and follow the apps best practices (for
> >> apps), see
> >>
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPractices
> >> > ** It must have one or several integration or functional tests (for
> >> apps) to prove that it works. This allows to prove the app continues
> >> working when XWiki progresses
> >> > ** The main contributors of the extensions must agree about the move.
> If
> >> they have the “level" to be an xwiki dev committer then they should be
> >> voted in (see
> http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership).
> >> If not then either they’re ok to send Pull Requests or the extension
> should
> >> not be moved.
> >> >
> >> > * If an extension ceases to work or if its quality becomes too low, it
> >> can be moved to xwiki-contrib with a VOTE
> >> >
> >> > * We would create one JIRA project per extension
> >> >
> >> > * We would create a new JIRA Category called “XWiki Extensions”
> >> >
> >> > * We would put the extensions in our CI at http://ci.xwiki.org
> >> >
> >> > * The Java package should follow the same rule as for XWiki Platform,
> >> i.e. org.xwiki.<short project name>. Exceptions would need to be
> discussed.
> >> >
> >> > * The group id for extensions having their own repo should be
> >> org.xwiki.<short project name>. The <short project name> needs to be
> part
> >> of the VOTE when proposing a new extensions.
> >> >
> >> > Here’s my +1
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > -Vincent
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sergiu Dumitriu
> >> http://purl.org/net/sergiu
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devs mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Denis Gervalle
> > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to