I’m fine with MCR2.A too for now.

I think I’d have preferred a wizard approach with several steps. Rationale:
- less items visible on each screen. I find it a bit overwhelming to try to 
cram everything on one screen 
- more space to add future refactoring options

Thus I’d have liked to use a wizard approach similar to what we do for the 
Distribution Wizard or the Create Wiki wizard. For example have one step for 
viewing all affected pages when deleting or all page that will have their 
parents modified, etc.

Also note that a nice option (while waiting for the alias solution, see 
http://markmail.org/message/d34smnyap5y6l24c) would be to have a checkbox to 
leave a redirect when Renaming or Moving wiki pages. If this is selected we 
would put a $response.sendRedirect(…) call as in 
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Redirect (this could be 
done later on ofc but it’s also not very complex to do and would provide a nice 
feature that is asked by xwiki users).

Thanks
-Vincent

On 24 Aug 2015 at 12:54:04, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau 
([email protected]) wrote:

About Move/Rename/Copy, I also say +1 for MCR2.A.  

So it seems MCR 2.A is the favorite choice in the community.  

Thanks,  

2015-08-18 18:01 GMT+02:00 Marius Dumitru Florea <  
[email protected]>:  

> Hi Caty,  
>  
> I feel the create UI has too many options. Even if they have defaults,  
> the user may still loose time scanning / understanding what they mean  
> (e.g. "is this setting useful to me?"). Ideally, the user should  
> select at most the type of page to create (blank or from a template)  
> before entering the edit mode. The rest could be changed afterwards,  
> from edit mode (e.g. title) or after the document is saved (e.g. move  
> to a new location). But this requires more work, so +1 for TL.  
>  
> Regarding the create tree, the document location is IMO the document  
> reference, so the "parent" + the "identifier". Thus it doesn't make  
> sense to me to have a separate identifier field and a location field.  
> There should be only one Location field. When you edit the location  
> you should be able to change the parent and the identifier. For the  
> identifier a plain text input is enough. For the parent we can use the  
> tree. The proposal that matches this is Tree 3, so +1 for that.  
>  
> +1 for Delete 1+2: Count + Link  
>  
> For move/copy/rename, I agree with Edy that it's best to have separate  
> screens. For rename the way we specify the target page should be  
> consistent with the create UI, as Edy suggested (i.e. title +  
> location, and the location gets expanded into parent + identifier).  
> For the move/copy we should reuse the "expanded" version of the  
> Location field from the create UI (i.e. parent + identifier, where  
> identifier is read-only of course). So something close to MCR 2.A.  
>  
> Thanks,  
> Marius  
>  
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)  
> <[email protected]> wrote:  
> > Hi devs,  
> >  
> > This iterations covers page actions: create, delete, rename, copy, move.  
> > Also it contains a proposal on the tree displayer inside page actions.  
> >  
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedActions  
> >  
> > Thanks,  
> > Caty  
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to