On 8 Sep 2015 at 15:50:33, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) 
([email protected](mailto:[email protected])) wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> This vote has not be concluded.
>  
> The majority of votants were in favor of the term 'Page', since it's easier
> for end users to understand.  

Note that in the VOTE results, we should count binding VOTEs (ie from 
committers) separately (even though other people’s VOTE should be taken into 
consideration by committers when they VOTE themselves).

> We should take this conclusion in consideration when doing changes to the
> translations, in order to assure consistency.  

I see you’ve gone ahead and replaced Documents by Pages everywhere. Personally 
this looks to me. Note that the same will need to be done in the documentation 
on xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) probably. Even though in lots of cases Documents 
is more precise than Page, it’s probably simpler for users to read Pages.

Said differently I’m in favor of using Pages when both Pages and Documents 
would fit, in order to make it simpler for users.  

Since Page = rendered(Document) + Panels + Skin, anything that talks about 
Document can be modified to talk about Pages I think (it’s just less precise). 
I couldn’t find a sentence where it would be plain wrong to talk about Pages 
instead of Document. For example, “the xobjects of this page” works IMO, since 
a page is more than a Document so it’s a short way of saying “the xobjects of 
the document contained by this page”.

I can think of 2 exceptions:
* Dev documentation. For example to explain the $xwiki.getDocument() API it’s 
probably better to mention Document instead of Page
* For a Page definition… :) For example: “In XWiki a Page is the rendered 
version of a Document’s metadata (content, title, xobjects, etc), including 
Skin elements and Panels”.

WDYT?

Thanks
-Vincent

> Thanks,
> Caty
>  
>  
>  
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Thibaut Camberlin <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>  
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think that pages should be used for everything that is exposed to end
> > users. From an end user perspective, there is no difference between a page
> > and a document, so there is no point in using 2 different wordings. Page
> > makes more sense IMO.
> >
> > Document should be used for XWik advanced users.
> >
> > --
> > Thibaut
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu  
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 01/10/2011 12:49 PM, Gregory GUENEAU wrote:
> > > > +1 also for page, for the same reasons raised by others
> > > >
> > > > BUT : could we have it as a variable in the admin ? We could imagine
> > > situations where it is important for the user to name it document, and to
> > > name a space as "folder", or "application".
> > >
> > > No, this is going to do more harm than good. What do we write in the
> > > documentation? Do we make 2-3 sets of screenshots to show the possible
> > > display variants?
> > >
> > > > More : as we have page type management, could we have generic page
> > types
> > > (page, document, code, etc.) with specific icon in the UI ? Same with
> > spaces
> > > (space, project, application, etc.)
> > >
> > > Valid idea for the future.
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le 7 janv. 2011 à 16:53, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) a écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> We are using mixed naming when referring to a document/page, not only
> > on
> > > >> different pages, but also in the same context (Rename step for
> > example).
> > > >> There is also an issue referring to this problem
> > > >> XWIKI-5401and we need
> > to
> > > >> find an answer in order to move forward consistency.
> > > >>
> > > >> So the question is which version we prefer: "Page" or "Document" ?
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm voting +1 for "Page".
> > > >>
> > > >> "Page" is more used IMO, especially in the "Space"/"Page" context.
> > > >> "Page" is more general than "Document" and better fitted for a
> > platform
> > > that
> > > >> encapsulates all kind of content (not just documents).
> > > >>
> > > >> Please cast your vote.
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to