> On 18 Mar 2016, at 21:23, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip]
>> Sure. Even so, I still find it relevant enough to have this ("Extra")
>> "Information" docextra/viewer/etc. since it can be useful to display
>> important stuff (specially to advanced users) that don`t really deserve a
>> dedicated view.
>>
>> Examples of stuff I`d personally like to see in that tab:
>> - Document Programming Right status (advanced)
>> - Document Script Right status (advanced)
>> - Document displayed with sheet X? (advanced)
>> - Document lock status?
>>
>
> - If it's terminal or not
Other ideas:
- Computed permissions (with a click since it can take some time to compute)
showing who has the various rights on this page (to view, edit, comment,
delete, etc)
- Other metadata of XWikiDocument:
-- Syntax
-- Content author (vs author and creator) and content update date (vs creation
date and update date) (advanced)
-- custom class (advanced)
-- whether the doc holds an XClass and which one (advanced)
-- list of xobjects (advanced)
-- default template (advanced)
Thanks
-Vincent
> - etc.
>>
>> Of course we can work on the naming if you like... tough it will be tough
>> to find a better name IMO :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Eduard
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree that View Source could be moved in Information.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it mean you’re ok with the other bullet point entries?
>>>>>
>>>>> Also I didn’t mention it, but this proposal means reorganizing the VMs
>>>>> (menu_content.vm and shortcuts.cm) since right now the vm for
>>> displaying
>>>>> the second part of the More Actions menu is called shortcuts.vm and
>> its
>>>>> first line is:
>>>>>
>>>>> #if (!$docextralinks && !$docextras)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -Vincent
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Caty
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi devs,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here’s the outcome of a discussion I had with Caty/Edy on IRC +
>>> addition
>>>>>>> of some elements of my own.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The idea is to clarify our strategy for the “More Actions” menu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So here’s a proposal:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * The More Actions menus is actually a "More" menu since it doesn't
>>>>>>> contain only actions. Specifically it contains 2 types of links:
>>>>>>> ** Actions such as Export, Annotate, Print, Share
>>>>>>> ** Information about the page (they're not actions): History,
>>>>>>> Comments/Annotations, Children, Attachments
>>>>>>> * The "View Source" entry is not placed correctly and should be
>> moved
>>> to
>>>>>>> the information section
>>>>>>> * The "Information" entry could be renamed or be made more specific
>>>>> since
>>>>>>> the whole section of the menu is about information about the page.
>> It
>>>>> used
>>>>>>> to contain children but that's been separated so all it contains now
>>> are
>>>>>>> included pages and backlinks. These could be transformed into 2
>>> viewers:
>>>>>>> one for includes pages and one for backlinks
>>>>>>> * The extradocs tabs do not need to match the information section of
>>> the
>>>>>>> "More" menu. We only display in the tabs the most important actions.
>>>>>>> * Idea: In order not to have too many tabs and to simplify the UI,
>> we
>>>>>>> could decide to remove the Information one and have "Included Pages"
>>> and
>>>>>>> "Backlinks" only as menu entries.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
