Guys, I’d like that we progress on this.

I didn’t get any agreement or disagreement to this proposal.

Any take?

Thanks
-Vincent


> On 18 Jan 2016, at 11:03, vinc...@massol.net wrote:
> 
> Hi devs,
> 
> After a lot of thinking and experimentation (see the thread’s details), I 
> have found that this first proposal is not a good idea. I’m thus proposing to 
> replace it with the following best practice:
> 
> * Let our script services generate exceptions
> * If the velocity scripts with to handle the exceptions, then they should use 
> the #try() directive. If they don’t want to, they don’t have to do anything 
> since the MacroTransformation or the template (contentvars.vm for example) 
> will catch it and display it to the user.
> 
> More precisely I’m proposing that:
> 
> * Existing Script APIs in Java should not be modified as that would break 
> backward compatibility. New signatures can be added and old one deprecated 
> and moved to the legacy modules. After new signatures have been introduced, 
> existing velocity scripts can be updated to use the new signatures and to use 
> the #try directive if needed.
> * New Script APIs must use the new best practices (if agreed :)), i.e. throw 
> Exceptions, and new velocity scripts must use the #try() directive if they 
> need to handle exceptions.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> 
> 
> On 14 Jan 2016 at 17:51:04, vinc...@massol.net 
> (vinc...@massol.net(mailto:vinc...@massol.net)) wrote:
> 
> > Hi devs, 
> > 
> > Right now our strategy is for script services and script APIs in general to 
> > catch exceptions, store them and offer a getLastError() method to get them 
> > (see 
> > http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Script+Module#HBestPractices)
> >  
> > 
> > However it would be much nicer to: 
> > * Let our script services generate exceptions
> > * Offer a velocity script service to get the last exception raised by a 
> > java call from velocity
> > * Implement this uberspector to catch the exceptions and to set them in the 
> > execution context
> > 
> > That should be quite easy to implement IMO. 
> > 
> > WDYT? 
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > -Vincent
> > 
> > PS: This is http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-2374 

_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs@xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to