+1 for "visibility", as it`s about configuration/customization and it would be in line with macros, JSX, SSX, etc.
Thanks, Eduard On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > On 12 Apr 2016, at 14:22, Alexandru Cotiuga <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hello devs, > > > > Since Nested Spaces has been introduced in XWiki, the need of configuring > > some applications at space level has also appeared. > > It was there before (skin, rights, etc) but I agree that it’s even more > important now. > > > There are already some configurable sections at space level: Look & Feel > > (Presentation, Page Elements, PanelWizard), Users & Groups (Rights: Page > & > > Children, Rights: Page) but they are not using the configurable class and > > they are defined in > > > https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/blob/master/xwiki-platform-core/xwiki-platform-administration/xwiki-platform-administration-ui/src/main/resources/XWiki/AdminSheet.xml#L60 > > having perSpace key. > > > > The new installed applications that have a configuration page, can't be > > configured now at space level and what I'm proposing in order to ease the > > way this can be achieved is to add a new boolean property perSpace to the > > XWiki.ConfigurableClass class. > > I think I’d prefer instead to introduce a “visibility” xproperty similar > to what we have in wiki Macros and wiki components. Which could be for the > moment: WIKI, SPACE (later on we could maybe add some config options that > are only visible at the farm level, i.e. on the main wiki). Another use > case in the future could be to have user-level configuration options too > (with a visibility of USER); this could be a way to reuse ConfigurableClass > for both Admin UI and User Profile UI in the future. > > Of course this means deprecating the “configureGlobally”. > > > Another idea would be to create a mix between this non-existing property > > and existing configureGlobally property and to create a new one with some > > options: Wiki, Wiki & space, Space but this involves a lot of changes tha > > might not worth the effort. > > I think it’s worth introducing a “visibility” xproperty. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > WDYT? > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
