On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 28 May 2016, at 15:06, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> On 28 May 2016, at 15:02, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> Hi devs, > >>>> > >>>> This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there are > some guidelines here: > http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename > >>>> > >>>> For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>. > >>>> > >>>> I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should be > renamed authenticator-android IMO. > >>> > >>> It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and > >>> implementing Android authentication API, so very different from other > >>> authenticator-* which are authenticator you install in XWiki. > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Regarding https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to decide > what to do on 2 aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just serves > as an examle for the generic discussion): > >>>> > >>>> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub > modules? Just use the concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should be > define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or “other-oidc” or something else. I > think just the concept name is ok. WDYT? > >> > >> Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about > >> prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't indicate anything. > >> > >>>> > >>>> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and > odic-provider. Should this be named authenticator-odic and provider-odic > instead to be in sync with > http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename. I think > so. WDYT? > >> > >> I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id > >> naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change > >> the ids of most of the platform modules… > > > > Contrib don’t have the same naming at all than xwiki github org. > > > > For xwiki github org we have: xwiki-<module>-<submodules> > > For contrib github org we have: <type>-<module>-<submodules> > > > We can reconcile this FTM by saying that the naming rule of > <type>-<module>- is only for the top level name. And submodules always > follow the rule of <topmodulename>-<submodule>. > Repeating the top module name is redundant IMO, that's why I've used application-ckeditor/ui and application-filemanager/api https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-ckeditor A related discussion http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Remove-all-duplicated-information-from-folders-names-on-git-repositories-tt7585141.html Thanks, Marius > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > Thanks > > -Vincent > > > > > >> > >>>> > >>>> See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> -Vincent > > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
