On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Caty,
>
> thanks for your feedback.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> [email protected]
> > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Caty,
> > >
> > > thanks for your proposal. Looking good overall!
> > >
> > > My preference goes to Layout3 (a new one):
> > >
> > >    - Left panel set to "Large"
> > >       - Navigation panel
> > >       - Tips panel
> > >    - Right panel set to "Small"
> > >       - Applications panel
> >
> > The right panel would need to accommodate also a Support panel. The
> > screenshots is lacking this since I don't have a voting proposal yet, but
> > this is an example:
> >
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/HomepageSketches/WebHome/layout2.png
> >
> > The problem with the navigation panel is that because of its scalability
> it
> > cannot be placed as first item, since it will overpower and push down any
> > other panel (in your case Tips + Support).
> >
>
>
> > The pattern for AppBar is to be placed on the left. I haven't seen
> anywhere
> > it being placed on the right. If we brake this 'standard'/'consistency'
> > users will be affected.
> >
>
> I agree with this. However, what I've seen on several XWiki implementation
> is the following:
>
>    - Main wiki with wide left panel and navigation menu there which is a
>    very, very common pattern. Some examples:
>    - WikiTerritorial
>       <
> http://www.wikiterritorial.cnfpt.fr/xwiki/wiki/econnaissances/view/Notions-Cles/Panoramadelactualitedescollectivitesterritoriales-edition2016
> >
>       - Centre de ressources USH
>       <
> http://ressourceshlm.union-habitat.org/ush/Dossiers/Dossier+Abattement+de+la+TFPB+dans+les+quartiers+prioritaires+de+la+politique+de+la+ville
> >
>       - FOPH <http://www.foph.fr/oph/Ressources/>
>       - It's also the standard menu on Google Sites for instance
>
>  Hi Guillaume,

Thanks very much for your examples. It depends very much on the wiki's
flavor, if it's focused on content/hierarchy or on applications.
On an empty wiki is a bit hard to have relevant content that can make sense
for newcomers.

Layout 1 showcases that you can have a bit of both: apps + hierarchy.
Unfortunately the admin would need to change this to suit his future needs
+ the AppBar is not displayed with the standard styling.

Layout 2 has the nice styling of AppBar, showcases the apps, has the
breadcrumb as navigation (with some discoverability issues, but with an
additional homepage text + tour). But the emphasis is lesser on content.


>
>    - Appbar on the left for workspace subwikis (where it makes a lot of
>    sense indeed)
>
> > And I would drop "My recent modifications".
> >
> > Since now we want to have a wiki-content page I think is important to
> > preserve the wiki-features like "Recent modifications".
> >
>
> What I know is that I never use this :-) Let's see what others say.
>

Yes. Thanks,
Caty


>
> Guillaume
>
> Anyway, thanks for your input. Waiting for more opinions.
> >
> > Caty
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Guillaume
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> > > [email protected]
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > This is a follow up on the initial brainstorming done, see
> > > > http://markmail.org/message/hbuhhkxcjodtfxwi
> > > >
> > > > This proposal aims to replace the current Dashboard with a more
> simple
> > > wiki
> > > > content page:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/HomepageSketches/HomepageLayoutVote/
> > > >
> > > > I would like you to vote on the 2 versions of left panels:
> > > > 1. AppBar + Pages
> > > > 2. AppBar
> > > >
> > > > Also provide feedback on the content. I've added the content on this
> > > page:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/HomepageSketches/HomepagePrototype/
> > > > in order for you to see how it behaves with the editors. [1]
> > > >
> > > > The objective was to have an easy to edit content, very close to what
> > we
> > > > have in view mode.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know what you think.
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Caty
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] Since we don't have CKEditor installed on design wiki, see how it
> > > would
> > > > looks like
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/HomepageSketches/WebHome/ckeditor.png
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > devs mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devs mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to