On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau < [email protected]> wrote:
> 2016-06-30 11:16 GMT+02:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]>: > > > In the 'farm' case I think we need to > > provide a custom tour that emphases the isolation or particular actions > and > > if we really want to put it in commons we need to particularly check the > > 'farm' case, since it would be annoying to have the tour launch every > time > > you create a new subwiki. > > > > So much complications while it's so quick and easy to close an undesired > tour... > > If the user starts dismissing the Tour because he gets spammed by them, then it means he doesn't read them, then it means we failed to help him. Thanks, Caty > > > I'm fine to put the dependency in xwiki-enterprise-ui-commons for 8.2, > but > > we will need to fix it to cover the 'farm'. > > > > Thanks, > > Caty > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 30 Jun 2016, at 10:29, Vincent Massol <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> On 30 Jun 2016, at 10:16, Guillaume Delhumeau < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I would put it in xwiki-enterprise-ui-tour(s) so we can easily > isolate > > > it > > > >> and other flavors can re-use it. > > > > > > > > Indeed that’s a good point. > > > > > > > > Actually, since the home page tour is not related to the home page > > > content (correct?) and it’s just related to the skin, I think I would > > even > > > put it in platform in the Help module (or better, in a submodule of the > > > Help module: xwiki-platform-help-tour, and move xwiki-platform-help as > > > xwiki-platform-help-syntax). > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > Hmm I retract this idea… The issue is that platform should not have a > > > dependency on the tour app even if it’s an indirect one. > > > > > > So +1 for xwiki-enterprise-ui-tour. > > > > > > Thanks > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > -Vincent > > > > > > > >> 2016-06-30 9:45 GMT+02:00 Vincent Massol <[email protected]>: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi Alex, > > > >>> > > > >>>> On 28 Jun 2016, at 13:43, Alexandru Cotiuga < > > > [email protected]> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> According to the new decided strategy in > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > > > > http://markmail.org/search/?q=[xwiki-devs]+[VOTE]+New+Strategy+for+the+XWiki+Github+Organization > > > >>> , > > > >>>> third-party extensions can by bundled in XWiki Enterprise. In some > > > cases, > > > >>>> we would need some content from those extension to be available at > > > build > > > >>>> time. Where could we put it? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Taking the Tour Application's example, which It is about to be > added > > > in > > > >>> the > > > >>>> dependency management of xwiki-enterprise and inherited in > > > >>>> xwiki-enterprise/xwiki-enterprise-ui/xwiki-enterprise-ui-commons, > we > > > >>> could > > > >>>> have the following options: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1) xwiki-enterprise-ui-commons as a space Tours > > > >>>> 2) xwiki-enterprise-ui-wiki as a space Tours > > > >>>> 3) xwiki-enterprise-ui-mainwiki as a space Tours > > > >>>> 4) in a new child module of xwiki-enterprise.ui (looks like "help" > > > >>> keyword > > > >>>> would make sense: xwiki-enterprise-ui-help) which could be used > for > > > >>> future > > > >>>> cases > > > >>>> 5) in a new child module of xwiki-enterprise-ui having a specific > > name > > > >>> for > > > >>>> tours. > > > >>> > > > >>> Indeed the Homepage tour should be part of the XE flavor. > > > >>> > > > >>> The question is: > > > >>> Do we want the tour to start on each subwiki home page? > > > >>> > > > >>> My opinion: > > > >>> * We should have the tour running on subwiki home pages only when > the > > > >>> subwiki is an isolated wiki (ie not in the use case of xwiki.org > for > > > >>> example but yes for the use case of myxwiki.org for example). > > > >>> > > > >>> So if we say that the homepage should be present for both main wiki > > and > > > >>> subwiki (and only triggered in some cases for subwikis) then it > makes > > > sense > > > >>> to have it in 1) (and not in 2) or 3)). > > > >>> > > > >>> We could do 4) or 5) in the future if there’s a need but for now > I’d > > > say > > > >>> 1). > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks > > > >>> -Vincent > > > >>> > > > >>>> Could we decide a new rule for this topic? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > >>>> Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > > > devs mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devs mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > > > > > > -- > Guillaume Delhumeau ([email protected]) > Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS > Committer on the XWiki.org project > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
